Nothing is certain in this movie obviously so there's no "proof" of anything, but based on Kint's statements there's no reason to believe Kobayashi exists at all (let alone that he's a lawyer.) Sure someone picks Kint up at the end of the movie, and that is the same actor playing the person dramatizing Kint's statements to Kujan, but you have to assume everything Kint tells him is pure fabrication.
If you just look at what is "known" outside of Kint's statements, you realize that everything between the actual line-up in New York and the shooting of Keaton by Kint/Soze is based entirely on Kint's statements, which are shown to be unreliable — at best. There's no reason to even trust that McManus, Fenster or Hockney were in LA at all, or even saw them after they were released from the holding cell (everything we know about what occurred in the cell is based on Kint's testimony to the prosecutors in LA.). The robbery of the police obviously happened (Kujan knows of it; it would have been a national story given its scope) but there's no reason to believe "the usual suspects" we're involved in anyway.
Keaton's whole personality as described by Kint is totally at odds with the killer described by Kujan. Kujan's depiction is far more reliable.
Soze as a myth obviously is known. I'd say on the evidence presented in the movie that Kint is him, but what his business was with the other criminal, Keaton, nothing is ever said for certain
reply
share