MovieChat Forums > Se7en (1995) Discussion > What will happen to Mills?

What will happen to Mills?


What would be the most likely outcome after what he did at the end?

reply

Some prison time. He did empty his gun into an unarmed, handcuffed prisoner.

Let's be bad guys.

reply

And career-wise? Suspension, fired? I suppose you cannot be a police detective with a felony on your sheet.

reply

Oh, most definitely. His career is done.

Let's be bad guys.

reply

A judge may not convict him due to the circumstances. The law look after their own. His career would be done though I agree.

Cardboard Box is the Future.

reply

A "temporary insanity" plea could perhaps stick. After all, who wouldn't lose their mind when they found out that their spouses had been decapitated?

And mandatory psychiatric/psychological care, which he probably would be more than willing to get anyway.

reply

It's such a weird circumstance, that's why the film is so great. If you asked 1000 people if Mills deserved full punishment if it were real life I'm sure more than 95% would say no. I think if I was Mills I would've done the same, his life was just destroyed in an instance.

reply

I agree he probably would have entered a plea of temporary insanity particularly as he had just found out about the baby. I don't think he could have kept his job though.

reply

The judge is irrelevant.

In our society (based on English law) the Jury of the People determine guilt, and I don't think you could find anybody willing to imprison the detective. They would consider it "justice" to see a murderer getting killed by a grieving husband.

A judge can not overrule a "not guilty" by a jury.

reply

A defendant can choose a bench trial over a jury trial.

reply

In our society it is the Jury of the People who determine guilt, and I don't think you could find anybody willing to imprison the detective. They would consider it "justice" to see a murderer getting killed by a grieving husband
.

reply

They would consider it "justice" to see a murderer getting killed by a grieving husband


Not everyone. I'm sure plenty of people would see it as a cop gunning down an unarmed, handcuffed prisoner.

Going with the tone the movie lays out (living in a crapsack world), Mills would do some time.

Let's be bad guys.

reply

Not everyone. I'm sure plenty of people would see it as a cop gunning down an unarmed, handcuffed prisoner.

Going with the tone the movie lays out (living in a crapsack world), Mills would do some time.


If it were trial by jury, good luck getting 12 strangers to agree on that. You might get at most 2-3 SJW's adamant that Mill's should do some time, but the bulk of the jury would be just as adamant that he should go free. The 2-3 would NEVER sway all of the remaining jurors, so it would either be "endless" hung juries, or the majority would sway the 2-3 to the not guilty side.

The most likely outcome would be a plea deal and a slap on the wrist, ie. no prison time.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PUE8fYxjq8

This man planned and executed what was essentially first degree murder, and did no time. He plead no contest to manslaughter and got 5 years probation. Mills would get something similar.

reply

Again, based on the themes and tones the movie itself sets down, Mills does time. It would be very easy to get 12 strangers to send him to jail because that's the crapsack world the movie takes place in.

You might get at most 2-3 SJW's adamant that Mill's should do some time,


Yikes. Why is it only a SJW who thinks cops shooting handcuffed, unarmed suspects should be subject to some type of penalty?

Let's be bad guys.

reply

Yikes. Why is it only a SJW who thinks cops shooting handcuffed, unarmed suspects should be subject to some type of penalty?

But despite being handcuffed and unarmed John Doe is still in the process of carrying out a complex plan to torment and destroy Mills and drive him to kill. Also, the crime Mills committed is not murder. It falls under the category of voluntary manslaughter by reason of provocation.

I don't think there's any possibility that Mills would have done a custodial sentence. Yes, there would have been a small number of people who would have been moral absolutists who would have been willing to convict him on a murder or manslaughter charge that carried custodial time (and that wouldn't just be left-wingers as the poster talking about SJWs implies, I think there would equally be right-wingers who might want to convict based on inflexible religious convictions), but if you laid out the facts of this case to a jury and gave them a choice between not guilty by reason of insanity or sending Mills to jail - for killing the most sadistic serial killer of recent times who had just murdered his wife and unborn child, I don't think many of them would be willing to countenance jail time. It's difficult to get juries to convict cops in any case, let alone one with such extreme circumstances.

The District attorney wouldn't want this to go to trial. Mills would get a plea deal that carried some counselling and probation. Mills probably wouldn't be allowed to be a homicide detective anymore but there'd be enough sympathy for him that he could probably get a desk job if he wanted to remain in law enforcement. But whether he goes to prison or not is irrelevant to Doe's punishment for Mills. His punishment is that he has to live with the murder of someone he loved.

Again, based on the themes and tones the movie itself sets down, Mills does time.

I don't see that at all. It's a depressing story but it's not set in a world where everybody always acts as a cruel moral absolutist. In fact one of the themes is that John Doe is unique in acting that way.

reply

Again, based on the themes and tones the movie itself sets down, Mills does time


I seriously doubt it, good luck finding 12 jurors who would agree on that. People have committed far worse in real life, ie what was essentially first degree murder in plain site of numerous police officers, and copped a plea deal that saw them serve zero time. At worst, Mills would have been offered something similar. Mill's punishment was having to live with the fact that his wife was murdered and head chopped off.

reply

good luck finding 12 jurors who would agree on that.


In the movie, it'd be super easy. Just write them to do that. Again, I'm stating this based on the setting of the movie's world. It's a crapsack world. So, he'd receive a crapsack sentence.

Seize the moment, 'cause tomorrow you might be dead.

reply

Years of counseling. He'll have to start over.

reply

[deleted]

In my opinion he is guilty. No buts about it. Killed unarmed prisoner who testified to his crimes. Mills knew very well what he was doing. At least 10 years.

reply

No way he would get 10 years. Jury nullification would be the most likely outcome.

reply

Cops often do not go to jail after doing far worse things than blowing away the man who murdered and beheaded your pregnant wife. The force frequently covers up for its own in far more questionable circumstances. And not just in the USA. In some countries, CCTV footage of police killing demonstrators has a way of going missing, or the camera was allegedly not working.
They might even cover it up for all we know. Difficult, with a helicopter and several witnesses, but not impossible.

"Chicken soup - with a *beep* straw."

reply

Very difficult. Since there was a beheaded body, the "victim" was in handcuffs, plus that he was shot a good many times.

I am guessing they would rather go for the temporary insanity plea.

reply

That is the easier option, certainly.

"Chicken soup - with a *beep* straw."

reply

If the police reported the actual events to the DA, he would be charged with murder. He knew right and wrong, he hesitated and made a conscious decision to kill him. 1st degree murder, 100%. Premeditation does not require a long period of planning. It could be just a moment or two. This is the law, not my opinion.

reply

No, it doesn't necessarily work that way. Gary Plauche's killing of Jeff Doucet was as premeditated as you can get (he found out where Doucet would be, went there with a gun, waited for him, and shot him at point blank range in the head as he walked by, while Doucet was being escorted by police, handcuffed no less), and it was even captured on video. Due to the circumstances, Plauche was only charged with second-degree murder, but plea bargained down to manslaughter. He got a 7 year sentence, suspended (meaning he didn't go to prison), along with 5 years probation and 300 hours of community service.

Judge Frank Saia ruled that sending Plauche to prison would not help anyone, and that there was virtually no risk of him committing another crime.


Everything about the Plauche case applies as much or more so to the fictional Mills case in this movie.

In the former case, the guy who got shot had kidnapped and sexually assaulted Plauche's son, and Plauche killed him 10 days after finding out, via a carefully planned ambush at an airport.

In the latter case, the guy who got shot had beheaded Mills' wife, mailed the head to him, and also informed him that she was pregnant, and Mills killed him several minutes after finding all this out.

So, Mills was provoked to a much greater degree than Plauche was (because murdering his wife and unborn child is a far more serious offense than Doucet's offense), and the provocation was 100% deliberate, and Mills was still very much in the "heat of the moment", while Doucet was 10 days past it. And of course, both Doucet and Doe were unarmed and in handcuffs when they were shot to death.

reply

His career is over, he murdered an unarmed prisoner. He might be able to cop a temporary insanity plea and avoid heavy jail time though.

reply

Jail and he probably hung himself in his cell

reply

SPOILER

I can't imagine any jury agreeing to convict Mills. It was an impossible situation for any reasonable person to handle. John Doe killing and cut off his wife's head and murder his unborn baby. All after several difficult mentally and physically days for him (getting shot and seen horrifying sights). In this context, his actions make sense, and many jurors may feel sympathy for him.

From a public perspective, there is no chance it will end without extensive media coverage, leading to demonstrations by thousands of citizens in support of the policeman. The case is too unprecedented to be treated as just another murder case. The acts were too cruel and horrific to allow the justice system to punish Mills. Moreover, I can envision the police defending him and allowing him to keep his job in the police department.

reply

He would be too mentally broken to be able, or even want, to still be a policeman. The most probable, if he is innocent in the trial, is that he is confined in a mental hospital, and always supposing he doesn't kill himself...

reply

Good point. It's uncertain whether he will be in the right state of mind to continue police work. However, I doubt the court will decide to send him to a mental hospital, certainly not for an extended period. He could be eligible for reasons of unreasonable psychological manipulations applied on him or a temporarily difficult mental state resulting from the situation he found himself in. He may find himself in a mental hospital in the short term but not by court order. Fortunately, he avoiding the visual horror of witness what was in the box, so I think he will be able to maintain his sanity, at least. It's possible he will find it challenging to return to work as a policeman, but perhaps he will come back just to not let John Doe win. However, there is no way he will be returned to the homicide department.

P.S. It's really cool that the director didn't tell us what happened to Mills and let us assess, based on the way we perceive society and human psychology, how it will end.

reply

No doubt his career would be over but a first-year law student could easily get him free with a diminished capacity defense.

reply