MovieChat Forums > Rumpelstiltskin (1995) Discussion > sequel

sequel

posted 14 years ago by d_fife
8 replies | jump to latest

why didnt they have a sequel as they set it up to have a sequel!

and for the villagers, dont you think they reminded any of you of FRANKENSTIEN?

[–] browneyed_chick23 13 years ago

With the ending that they left, I don't see how that they could. It setup to have a squeal, but it always had to be a first born. The lady at the end of the movie had a baby yes, but it wasn't her first born because the older child called her mommy.

[–] SweetLikeTropicana 13 years ago

Badly written, that's all I can say. You've probably realised something in that thought that the writers never did.

[–] d_fife 13 years ago

any other guesses why they didnt have a sequel?

[–] indalay422 12 years ago

First born SON, and it was the same baby boy as Shelly had!! LOL

[–] davidlau17 12 years ago

Because it was a terrible movie that bombed hard at the box office. Its budget was $3,000,000 but it only made $306,494. I couldn't imagine it being a success on video either. The few who did watch it probably, like me, felt compelled to gouge their eyes out.

[–] d_fife 12 years ago

they should have made a sequel

[–] 12 years ago

[deleted]

[–] JohnnyQuid1 9 years ago

Rumplestiltskin 2: UnclevRumpy returns

Rumplestiltskin 3:Rumping ain't easy (Rumplestiltskin becomes a successful rapper and pimp)

Rumplestiltskin 4: Rumpy pumpy (he's a porn star in this one)

Rumplestiltskinman vs Leprechaunman (I guarantee this will be 50 times better than Batman vs Superman)

these films need to be made.