The monopoly man......???

What were they thinking? Why was he even in this movie? If you are doing a nature documentary, AT LEAST try to be accuate. Where were his blue pants? Where were his coat tails? Where where the bags of money??? Come on, get real! You expect an audiance to take you serious this entire movie, then just throw in a "monopoly guy" who looks nothing like the real deal? IT JUST DOESN'T ADD UP! Maybe if the directors of this movie thought seriously for a second before just completly ruining this film. If you are putting the monopoly man in a film, PUT HIM IN RIGHT! He DOESN'T HAVE A MONOCOL! WHAT DON'T YOU PEOPLE GET! A film that is this accurate and thought out, to just have them toss asside the monopoly guy like this is disgusting. Do it right, or don't do it. You might as well have just put in Wilford Brimley in a white silk unitard with a glass cane and called him the Kernal! YOU CAN'T FOOL ME STEVEN OEDEKERK! THIS IS BULL$HIT AND I'VE CALLED IT!!! Not to mention, why was steve urkle chaseing Ace at the end of the film in the villiage???