MovieChat Forums > Quiz Show (1994) Discussion > The Moral Equivalent of a Parking Ticket...

The Moral Equivalent of a Parking Ticket?


"Quiz Show" is an excellent film. (It was also partly shot at Fordham University in the Bronx, where I went to school.)

I believe director Robert Redford saw the quiz show scandal as a type of metaphor for life in the United States during the much-loved 1950s, meaning that appearances can be deceiving and deep down there were serious problems that were concealed by the glossy image on the surface.

Although he made a great film, I wonder if Redford overreaches. So "21" was rigged, and the contestants got the answers. The film implies that NBC and Geritol, which sponsored the show, both knew this. So who was getting cheated? No Geritol money was stolen. Was anyone even indicted? No.

Imagine making a great film (well-shot, well-acted, and well-directed) about getting a parking ticket.

Also, the film itself isn't completely accurate. Actual events and persons were changed to tell a better story. So if Redford can alter the truth to tell a better story, then why couldn't the folks behind "21" bend the truth for entertainment purposes?

And about 10 years after HUAC's investigation into Communism in Hollywood, you wonder why investigating the television industry--or namely "21"--seemed to have been welcomed.

The 1950s have been praised to the skies as a great time in America before the decadent 1960s, but it's been Hollywood ironically that helped create the nostalgia.

It was by no means a perfect or great decade. There were two big recessions (and a smaller one in 1960--which helped JFK in the campaign). The Korean War cost 50,000 American lives in three years--it took the Vietnam War 10 years to rack up 58,000 Americans dead. It ended in a negotiated settlement without defeating North Korea in the way Japan, Germany, and Italy were defeated. The racial segregation in the south was often discussed in the media and not hidden. And the world lived in fear of nuclear war. I'm no 50s-bashing liberal who idolizes everything about the 1960s (I lean to the right), but I don't think the 1950s were either the nostalgic Golden Age of the United States or a phony facade that concealed major problems. Like every decade, it had its good points and bad.

reply

Well, interesting post. Sorry nobody responded until now. You made some good points ... It's s good movie but wether Redford was using it as a metaphor I don't know but I understand your sentiment. I mean Congress got involved. Think of this... The U.S. give. also became involved in Major League Baseball after 1919 to make sure it was ""on the level." I guess we should be grateful we live in a country where such trivial (no pun intended) matters are taken seriously (in other words we have it good). Personally, I think like u that the 50s were basically not much different than a lot of decades. It had its good points and bad. A little phony. But it was in the years after a horrible Depression and Apocolyptic War. In a way all decades have a facade that concealed major problems.

reply

Although he made a great film, I wonder if Redford overreaches.


He may have embellished a bit between the Jewish Goodwin and Protestant Van Doren, (but I bet not) but he didn't "overreach" the scandal, it was real, you can still research that.
Ephemeron.

reply

By "overreaching," I meant Redford seeing the Quiz Show scandals (there were others, not just "21") as a metaphor for America at the time.

reply

Well we really need to read the book to answer this question. Because the book it is based on, by Goodwin. is called "Remembering America: A Voice From the Sixties" not Quiz Show, and the book just starts with that and then delves into the sixties, so my guess is the reach is a metaphor for a part of America and some of what it was like before all hell broke loose!


Ephemeron.

reply