Quite possibly.
Great cast, good director... but nothing works. Almost like they were all on sleeping pills.
Compared to what???? People like you blow my mind....trying to figure our the standards you must be judging by...
No, they weren't on sleeping pills...but youmay have been on something...god knows what, I'm not an expert on the current drug scene....
No, its not the worst movie of all time...but it is pretty bad. Or extremely mediocre, at best. My wife and I were both rather bored by it (although in fairness, we did finish it). I was surprised by the fact it was made in 1994. It has the feel of a movie made a decade earlier than that. Just about any film starring Michael Keaton is going to be no better than second-rate, however; we knew that going in. You watch a Keaton film, and you get what you deserve. Being disappointed by a Keaton film is like borrowing money from the Mafia, and then being all taken aback when they get angry at you for not being able to pay them back.
Gamera is really neat! He is made from turtle meat! We've been eating Gamera!
no way
I loved this movie
You knew things would turn out all right but they throw in some suspense anyway.
it's a cute movie but I like it a lot
[deleted]
If you think this is possibly the worst movie of all time then you evidently haven't seen many movies. It's an OK film. One of Keaton's better performances if not his best.
Sarah Palin meets Terry Tate http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=07kO9TtHYzQ
Check out Roger Ebert's review, which might help you to understand the movie...clearly, you didn't. Coming from a guy who works at a newspaper (duh!), perhaps there are some things you didn't get.
shareI absolutely disagree with you. Not the worst film by any stretch.
I really like The Paper. It's like "The Family Man" with Nicholas Cage -- not a lot of people saw it in the theater, but it was still a great little movie.
-Jane