ratings BS


3.9? This film is meant to be enjoyed as a mindless action film, as such it delivers plus you have hilarious dialogue. I'd rather watch this and have a good laugh than 90% of the pseudo-drama films which are unbearable and usually rated around 6.0 on here. This movie should get between 5 and 6 for enjoyment alone!

><> <><

reply

This is NOT a mindless action film. It tries to be intelligent with its environmental themes and fails miserably.

reply

While this film has it's flaws, a rating of 3.9 is a real slap in the face. I'd say mid 5's to a 6, somewhere in that range.

reply

[deleted]

If you think that's a slap in the face, you should check out the 0% it holds on Rotten Tomatoes.

reply

Lol, it doesn't get any worse than 0%!

reply

It is easily one of Seagals best movies(not saying that much) its my fave among under siege 1&2 and out for justice. It's fun and pretty stupid and he has some points in the end speech although I wonder where those water cars are

reply

I love action movies, so I'm not a snob who watches nothing but the most serious and dire dramas and art house movies. I do enjoy some earlier Seagal movies, particularly Out for Justice.

That being said, I think 4.0 (it's actually gone up, unfortunately, since this thread was started) is far too generous. I rated it a 2; a 1 is reserved for something like Disaster Movie.

This movie is terrible.

_____________________________
I'm a heavy metal maniac.
Metal = best form of music ever

reply

Yeah I gave it 6. Seagal classic. Weaker than his famous quarteto but still pretty good action. People are too harsh on Seagal.

reply

When this came out I hated it, I would've given it a 2 or 3, today I like it a lot more so it's more of a 6 to 7 for me. Funny how the age you are when you watching something for the first time compared to watching it again when you're a lot older makes a big difference.

reply