MovieChat Forums > North (1994) Discussion > If this film is to become widely availab...

If this film is to become widely available once again...


...it's probably a good idea to revoke its copyright - in other words, send it to the public domain.

It was while a PD film that "It's a Wonderful Life" became a classic. And so, I think we should start a petition to get this film PD.

________
(start sig)
http://www.imdb.com/help/boards/markup

Good advice

reply

Except "It's a Wonderful Life" wasn't a *beep* movie, it was just underappreciated.

This on the other hand is a monstrosity and it lacks everything that made "It's a Wonderful Life" successful and heartwarming.

reply

What Postbagboy said. This film needs to stay buried.

reply

Yeah, I'm kind of wondering why anyone would compare this unlubed fisting of comedy to a holiday classic directed by Frank Capra and starring Jimmy Stewart.

---------------------
Why not phone up Robin Hood,
And ask him for some wealth distribution?

reply

Not trying to compare. I'm just saying that some works, underappreciated at first, became very popular once their copyrights expired.

________
(start sig)
http://www.imdb.com/help/boards/markup

Good advice

reply

A film falling into the public domain doesn't necessarily change a film's reputation. It simply means that since there is no copyright attached to it, it can be distributed without paying the studio. Television networks can play the film for free, home video companies can distribute it for free, and the entire movie can be posted on the Internet without the studio's permission. It can even be altered without consent from the production company. This is why "It's a Wonderful Life" was rediscovered years later: because it was free!

In fact, "Life" was loved by audiences and critics when it came out; it was even nominated for Best Picture at the Academy Awards. The reason the film did so poorly at the box office had little to do with its quality (it was expensive, competition with other films, etc.). Not all good films do well commercially.

On the other hand, "North" flopped BECAUSE of its quality. Critics trashed it, and audiences stayed away.

Plus, copyright law has changed since then. Originally a copyright was good for 28 years, then it had to be renewed to keep it from expiring. Now, "North" will probably enter the public domain when we're all dead.

However, if the copyright on "North" does expire, and the film does become widely available again, will its reputation change? That, unfortunately, cannot be explained.

reply

this atrocity of a movie is on Netflix now. enjoy while it lasts!

reply