I just didn't enjoy it


I expected to like this movie. I am a big Paul Newman fan; I like character driven slice-of-life films ... but this film left me cold. Very little about it was entertaining. It seemed more important to get a couple of actresses to show their breasts and to have Paul Newman say 'fork' several times (as well as to mention the size of his character's penis) than to get any interesting interaction between the characters or get inside their heads/emotions. Apparently many folks consider this a great movie but I just don't get it. Oh well.
Question: how do you think Sully and Peter got the snow-blower out of the fenced-in area? They couldn't have lifted it over then fence, could they? And if they used the chain cutter to cut through the fence, why didn't they use it to get inside the yard in the first place (instead of Peter climbing over)? I expected to see something about this mentioned in the goofs but instead found a ridiculous amount of continuity errors.

reply

My favorite Paul Newman movie actually.

reply

My favorite Paul Newman movie actually.


For me that would be Hud, though it is hard to choose.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Derekbd

reply

Just the opposite holds true for me...

I'm NOT a Paul Newman fan but I loved this movie!

As for the snowblower, good question.


Here's to those who wish me well...

reply

Great movie, really love it.

I wish you well, MissMillie

Cheers!

Joe

reply

[deleted]

Ok, I've only rented the movie twice, and think it's terrific. If I ever see the DVD in stores, I'm gonna pounce. I forget how this scene plays out in the movie.

However, I own the book; I must have read it 11 times and I still crack up. Richard Russo's prose is hilarious. For that matter, I recommend Straight Man as even more hilarious. (It's about a college professor, full of middle-aged ennui, whose dearly loved wife is out of town for a week. During her absence, he manages to fulfill all her worst expectations about him.)

Here in Nobody's Fool, they want to steal Carl's snowblower. The padlock on the gate is inside the fence, no big deal if you have the key to reach in and unlock it, but it would be too difficult to hacksaw the thing from the outside. There's also that Doberman to consider. So, they poison the dog, (it wasn't meant to be lethal, just temporary) go away and come back. Peter climbs the fence to hacksaw it from the other side and while he's doing this, the seriously stoned dog sneaks up on him. In the book, it's hilarious how Peter and Sully freeze while the dog is frozen from the drugs. In the book, time slows down for Peter, as he stares at the dog, reviewing his life, and comes to the conclusion that it would be a good thing if the dog tears his throat out. Then the dog keels over. Peter finishes with the lock, they open the gate, steal the snowblower, and Sully even reaches in and relocks the gate with a lock he found in his toolbox, so "nobody steals anything."

I believe they didn't show the next part in the movie, because the animal rights types would have a kitten, but in the book, it shows how Carl has fun tormenting that poor brain damaged animal. It is so sick, so sidesplitting funny I still cry with laughter after reading it 11 times. The ultimate cruelty, however, is when he leaves it with Sully, with a note on it's collar, "You damaged it, it's yours." Ultimately the poor unwanted animal ends up saving Sully's life.

I guess what I'm trying to say is that, if you didn't enjoy the movie, give the book a chance. The movie was a real good adaptation, but the book has more, a lot more, and it's one genuinely funny read.

reply

When did Sully say "fork"?

reply

With you on HUD, derekbd. Great film.

reply

Apparently many folks consider this a great movie but I just don't get it.
Well it's about characters and their struggles, like The King's Speech (which I admire), but I too did not enjoy it much, although it is interesting and the acting is good. I'm going to rewatch it, because I feel like I missed something.

"Did you make coffee...? Make it!"--Cheyenne.

reply

Although Paul Newman gave a wonderful performance, there was absolutely no plot to this movie. I kept watching expecting it to get better. And HBO's description was this "an irresponsible misfit falls in love with a younger unhappily married woman". What's up with that? I was expecting a May-December type of movie and instead I get a snoozefest.

I'm sure some of the brainy types out there will disagree and tell me I just don't get it but to each his own.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

I'm not here to say you're wrong. You didn't get it? OK.

Have you thought about why so many people thought it was so good?

reply