I've been frustrated by this, too, and thank you for your original post, Robot-Werewolf.
Someone else here mentioned the matter of licensing, and that certainly applies to many instances of this type of variable with different releases.
Honestly, though...Oliver Stone is very much a "final cut" kind of director. Also, the soundtrack by Trent Reznor was very much part of the development of this film, and woven into the fabric of it from the start. Plus, there are other Trent Reznor tracks in the cuts that omit "Burn." So, I actually don't think it's a licensing matter in this case (although, in many others, it likely would be).
It's probably related to Stone reconsidering the message that the lyrics juxtaposed with the images are sending. That, or just a personal aesthetic preference on Stone's part. I think the original sequence with "Burn" is brilliant, and was fine like it was and should never have been touched. Also, I think the version currently circulating is far weaker and less effective.
But, this film was made by an auteur working with a major studio and a big budget, whose score composer (and the composer of this track in question) was worked into the production proper, as opposed to Stone just "borrowing a track." I'm almost certain it's a Stone matter and not a licensing matter.
reply
share