MovieChat Forums > A Touch of Frost (2010) Discussion > What was the deal between Wingfield / IT...

What was the deal between Wingfield / ITV / Jason?



I guess it's fairly well-known that the author of the Frost books, RD Wingfield, claimed not to like the TV version.

So why did he let more TV shows be made after the first one? Did he completely give away all TV rights to the character in one fell swoop back in the early 90s? Did he no longer have any right to prevent extra episodes?

Or was he just happy to accept the money to let them make 14 series, because he didnt have to watch it if he didnt want to?

reply

Rodney Wingfield had no objection to the TV series being made, but he just felt that it was not 'his' Frost.

The production company made a number of changes to the character when the TV series was in development. Firstly, Frost swears heavily in the books, which was toned down for TV. Secondly, Frost in the books was a heavy smoker, and David Jason didn't want to smoke on screen, as he was aware that the changing times meant such habits were becoming more unacceptable, and that as Del Boy, he was almost constantly seen to be smoking. Instead, they turned the TV Frost into someone who had just given up smoking. Thirdly, Forst in the books had a rather keen interest in very young girls, and this didn't sit very easily with the producers of the TV series.

Rod Wingfield admired David Jason as an actor enormously, and was a big fan of him in Only Fools and Horses, but just felt the TV version of Frost was just too 'different' to his own conception of the character. However, the author did see the benefits of having the TV series as it meant wider readership for his novels, a greater chance for him to get 'his' Frost out there.

As for the rights issues, only 2 novels had been written when the TV series was first made (A Frost At Christmas 1984, and A Touch of Frost 1987). The majority of the TV episodes were original stories, not based on any of the novels. Some of the later books (Night Frost 1992, Hard Frost 1995, Winter Frost 1998, and, lastly, A Killing Frost 2008) were adapted for later episodes of the series (except 'Killing' which only came out this year, just after Wingfield's death). As I understand it, the rights that were originally sold included full use of the character, any of the material from the two novels published at that point, the exclusive use of any material written subsequently, and for the use of Wingfield's name in promotional material. No doubt it was a lucrative deal from Wingfield's point-of-view, but he lived very modestly, refused most offers of interview (even in spite of the money offered), and would not have been solely motivated by money.

So, all in all, though Wingfield wasn't keen on the TV series, for him, the benefits outweighed the negatives.

reply


Thanks for that. Really informative. Just on general principle, I hope he got a fair deal on royalties for the character, even if he chose to live modestly.


reply

My pleasure, padzok.

Yes, RD Wingfield was a fairly wealthy man. He just preferred to live in quiet obscurity (in Basildon, Essex, not far from me), choosing never to attend book launches or promotional events, very very rarely giving interviews, and had a real loathing of having his photo taken. Wingfield was just a very private man, and another reason possibly why he wasn't keen on the TV series was that it brought added interest in him as a person, which he found difficult to cope with.

David Jason did read the audio versions of the original novels, if you didn't know, so the character as Rod Wingfield originally conceived it was still portrayed by Jason in a way.

reply

I've read all but one of the novels, and I have to say that "book Frost" is very much like the TV version. Maybe they toned down a habit or two, but his attitude and sense of humor are the same.

And regarding David Jason, there's even a brief mention of him in one of the books. A policeman notes that there's going to be a crowd at some new store because David Jason is there to "open it" on its first day.

reply