MovieChat Forums > The Stand (1994) Discussion > worst thing i have ever seen

worst thing i have ever seen


they all appeared mentally challenged
hackneyed
cliche

molly ringwald worst acting ever

pure garbage

reply

they all appeared mentally challenged
hackneyed
cliche

molly ringwald worst acting ever

pure garbage
Holding back like this is not healthy. Tell us how you really feel. 

reply

[deleted]

I agree to a point, the actress who played Nadine was horrible. Molly Ringwald wasnt great either. Tom Cullen was great, Stu was fine. Larry sucked and so did Julie Lawry. Harrold was fine. Widh they would remake this as a feature!

reply

Just seen this is was on the horror channel few weeks back and was on my planner.
I liked parts 1 and 2 more than 3 or 4.
but then started to get a little boring.
Have seen a lot worst though so gave The Stand a 5.
Next I try watch The Langoliers , It and some of his other stuff.


www.youtube.com/eastangliauk

reply

Just seen this is was on the horror channel few weeks back and was on my planner.
I liked parts 1 and 2 more than 3 or 4.
but then started to get a little boring.
Have seen a lot worst though so gave The Stand a 5.
Next I try watch The Langoliers , It and some of his other stuff.
The Stand is easily my favorite SK novel and one of my favorites by any author. And because the mini-series followed the book so well, it is one of my all-time favorite films.

It was really pretty good IMO, and The Langoliers was not bad. The Shining by Kubrick was well-liked by some; but not by SK, it seems. He felt that Kubrick's version strayed too far from the novel. However, the version by Garris, even though it is much closer to the book, (SK wrote the script) seems to generate a lot less enthusiasm. Even though I have both versions, I have yet to see either, so I suppose I should bite the bullet one day soon and watch them.

I thought that both versions of Salem's Lot were pretty fair, but I thought the 2004 effort with Rob Lowe was slightly better. I'm forced to concede that I am in the minority on this, as most people hate the 2004 version.

Dreamcatchers was good and it followed the book pretty well, too.

There is a boatload of SK adaptations out there.

reply

[deleted]


What do you think of misery Gary? Also your for a treat with the shinning.
I have Misery on DVD and have watched it, but for some reason I did not seem to care for it all that much. The story just did not hold much appeal for me. I have not read the book.

I think I'll set myself down over the weekend and watch both versions of The Shining. It looks like it's going to be too cold to do anything outside anyway, and I've had DVD's of both versions for quite a while.

If I do, I'll let you know what I think. In general, I prefer the version that is closest to the source novel, and like I said in an earlier post, the Kubrick version strayed a lot from the book, and the Garris version was pretty true to the novel.

That is one of the reasons that I lke this version of The Stand so much: it is very faithful to the novel.

reply

[deleted]

So what did you think Gary of the shinings?
Because it is said to be a lot closer to the book, I decided to watch the Garris version first, but unfortunately, my DVD player chose that time to act up, so I had to use my portable. The disc works in the portable just fine, but I only got to finish Part I.

One of these days, I'll finish the rest of it. Then the Kubrick version.

I don't really care for Jack Nicholson all that much, however, and so that is one strike against the Kubrick film from the get-go.

Like I say, one day soon.

reply

Ditto, old fríend. For anyone who read the book, this would be a másterpiece, its so close to the story as your imagination allows it. I've missed talking about it as i ve missed talking to you.

reply


Ditto, old fríend. For anyone who read the book, this would be a másterpiece, its so close to the story as your imagination allows it. I've missed talking about it as i ve missed talking to you.
Well, I certainly hope that you were referring to me and if you were, then thank you. You're much too kind to this old man. Are you the lady whose first language was Portuguese?

Would you believe that I have yet to finish the mini-series of The Shining? The weather outside is dreadful so I might do that today.

It's good to hear from you again. How have you been?



PS The CBS DVD of The Stand has subtitles and audio in Portuguese in case you didn't know.

reply

Close. Spanish.
And i was talking about you. I finished reading IT like in 4 days. Have you read it?

reply


Close. Spanish.
And i was talking about you. I finished reading IT like in 4 days. Have you read it?
Thank you; like I say, I appreciate the very kind words. Yes, I have read It, and I have seen the mini-series as well. It ranks very highly in my King universe. While there were differences, the mini-series was reasonably faithful to the novel.

Incidentally, I just finished the Mick Garris version of The Shining, and thought that it was really pretty good.

Next DVD to watch is the Kubrick version of The Shining.

reply

Thank you; like I say, I appreciate the very kind words. Yes, I have read It, and I have seen the mini-series as well. It ranks very highly in my King universe. While there were differences, the mini-series was reasonably faithful to the novel.

Incidentally, I just finished the Mick Garris version of The Shining, and thought that it was really pretty good.

Next DVD to watch is the Kubrick version of The Shining.
Kubrick's version of it was decent as well. I'm not overly fond of Jack Nicholson, and I thought Rebecca de Mornay was better as Wendy than Shelley Duvall. On the other hand, Scatman Crothers was the better Dick Halloran. Over-all I give a slight edge to the Garris version.

Heresy? Perhaps, but I just liked the Garris version better.

On a somewhat sad note, I heard that one of the players in the 1980 film died: Anne Jackson. She was 90.

reply

[deleted]

Julie Lawry at the pharmacy was my favorite scene of the movie. She was so cartoonishly evil normally I hate this type of character but she sells it so good. It's downright hilarious and I loved it.

reply

I don't disagree with you about Molly Ringwald. I don't think they could have miscast the role of Frannie any worse if they had tried.

Having said that, after watching the mini-series and having read the book, oh, about 50 times now, I have begun to actually picture some of the characters in my mind the way that they appeared in the mini-series.

Stu will always be Gary Sinise, Larry is Adam Storke and I can't think of anyone better to play Tom than Bill Fagerbaake.

But there are others aside from Frannie who were miscast.

Corin Nemec? Really? Laura Sangiacomo is not Nadine. Rob freakin Lowe as Nick? Nuh-uh.

And imho I think Justin Long would be a great Nick Andros.

reply

I remember this film not leaving a strong impression on me. Probably because it felt to tv-acted for me. But i didn't understand the genre at the time so more than 20 years later I'd like to rewatch this if i can find it.

-- Sent from my 13 year old P.O.S. Desktop®

reply

hey leyenda61. I just found it on Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUs-1ejBVfU&t=163s
plus 3 other parts.

reply

It's now on Youtube in 4k in full for free. Just search for "The Stand 4k" and you'll find it. Feels like a new experience in such hi-definition.

reply

Completely agreed. And the production values are embarrassing. Awful.

reply

It was a made-for-TV mini-series made in 1994. What were you expecting? 

And, please don't say anything trite like, "high-production values" or something like that.

reply


Completely agreed. And the production values are embarrassing. Awful.
My curiosity is piqued here. What do you mean by this?

reply

He means the sets look cheap, the special effects are bad, and it’s shot like a soap with lots of close-ups instead of a cinematic style with vast widescreen expanses and complex camera moves.

While I agree, I don’t mind the restrained style, it puts the story and characters front and centre.

reply

ABC kept the series on a fairly tight budget, so it was shot on 16mm film to save money. In 1994 large screen televisions were still something of a rarity so the filmed for the television perspective. In 1994 it didn't seem so cheap. I was 26 when it aired, and I thought it was pretty impressive for a television production. Now 29 years later I agree it looks rinky-dink in places. But thanks to the power of nostalgia, I am willing to overlook such things.

reply

I kind of feel the acting is ick in most Stephen King productions. It flowed like his remake of The Shining (shouldn't be remade).

reply