stop sayinging its better than the first! its just offensive! the first is a masterpiece, the second isnt a bad movie but its just nothing on the first for so many reasons!
Heres some:
1)Waynes world 1 is awesome 2)Waynes world 2 is basically waynes world 1 with weaker jokes 3)Waynes world 1 is awesome
wow, you sig makes this entire post credible.....lol.....just kidding.....
i was never really into waynes world in the first place...i've only seen a few scenes of both movies....so i woldn't really be the one to say which one is better or worse but i'm watching it pn comedy central and i thought i would check it out on imdb....
Im not saying the movie is terrible but i think think its crazy to say its better. i think its something to do with seeing wayne world 1 first, at a certain point in your life and finding it hilarious. after that waynes world 2 just seems like weak jokes for money.
1)Waynes world 1 is awesome 2)Waynes world 2 is basically waynes world 1 with weaker jokes 3)Waynes world 1 is awesome
Have to agree with you on that, but I still like WW2, jut not as much as WW. In the first one, the jokes were inspired. The humor in WW2 sometimes feels forced; like, "Well, we made a lot of money with WW, so we've got to make a sequel for another cash run." But I stress "sometimes." The bit with Handsome Dan I thought was funny, but predictable. Del was a riot! Spiritual brother to Aldous Snow. And the ladies? Come on! Kim! Drew! Tia! Even Olivia D'Abo is cute underneath that "Female Garth" get-up. They tried hard to make a good, funny movie; occasionally they tried too hard, but for that I think they can be forgiven.
In short, there were some bits in this movie that worked, and some that didn't. Just like in any other comedy.
I think both are awesome but to me Wayne's World 2 is better. The humour is more random, which appeals to me a lot more and there are some great cameos. The story is pretty much the same as in the first movie but whatever, WW 2 has Del Preston!