Chris Penn
I just have question. During the earthquake, when Robert Downey and Chris Penn go after the young girls, does Chris Penn really go crazy on the little girl? If so, what was that about? his hidden side finally comes out?
shareI just have question. During the earthquake, when Robert Downey and Chris Penn go after the young girls, does Chris Penn really go crazy on the little girl? If so, what was that about? his hidden side finally comes out?
shareI just saw this movie, and I am wondering the exact same thing.
That made absolutely no sense. There was no reason for him to go crazy on her like that.
Anyone???
Pent up sexual frustration.
Really? That's odd because his wife seemed to be ready, willing, and able (as long as she wasn't on the phone "working")
shareyeah, that confuses me too. just saw it again for the second time.
i guess he wants "real" love, which he doesn't get from his wife. He could get sex, but she doesn't give him the feeling to be wanted.
He is confused why her having phone sex isn't as erotic as their sex life.
And he stores a lot of unfulfilled sexual pressure, e.g. seeing naked woman in swimming pool, his friend telling him sexual fantasies on the phone. And when his sexual fantasy girl refuses him he just goes nuts...
Still seems implausible to me, that he would just kill her like that.
That's a good post Caillois. And yeah, it does seem a bit implausible, especially since it happened so fast.
sharePeople snap all the time, you hear it on the news and read it in newspapers so that doesn't really bother me. What I'm wondering is what happened to the friend and what did Robert Downey's character do because I figured one, if not both of them, would have reported what actually did happen or that one of the wives would have discovered something wasn't right when they came back. I just finished watching it and that's the only thing that bothers me...the news anchor's report.
shareI don't think the stories are over. The movie is but their lives continue. Who knows what happens to those characters a day after, a month after, etc...
--
"Talking about music is like dancing about architecture." -Steve Martin
just watched the film. the news reporter says "a woman was killed by falling rocks (...) but we are still not sure if the death of the woman is related to the quake." so, the circumstances just weren´t clear at the time the news were broadcast.
shareWhen she finally suggested that they have sex, she didn't talk sexy to him like she did on the phone to the other men. She spoke to him like a child. When I saw it the first time, I thought she was being sincere. When I watched the scene again she seemed patronizing. Penn's character had major issues.
My question is, when they announced on the news that one person died because of the quake, they were referring to that girl. So what happened to her friend, who witnessed the attack? She would not have went along with the story that her friend died from a rock slide. It would have been called a murder.
exactly.she didn t have sex with him at home.just on the phone.
shareThere was no reason for him to go crazy
By definition, "reason" and "crazy" don't go together! In any case, he's shown as an automaton the whole movie, not reacting to his wife's "career," etc. At some point, he became unhinged and snapped.
[deleted]
[deleted]
It also seems weird that her death was described as "death by falling rocks". Wouldn't her friend tell the police what really happened?
"I can beat you with one hand..."
I think it was just the rage of a frustrated man. He is surrounded by people with crude attitudes towards sex - wife on sex line, friend talking about his crazy sex adventures. Then he sees the pretty nude girl in the pool, but he doesnothing. Then he is threatened by the black man at the jazz club, and he does nothing. He doesn't even have sex with his wife. It all built up - he felt more and more useless, more of an outsider, and his attitude towrds sex became more perverted. Until finally he sees these two young things, who emobdy sex for him, and he can't take it anymore, and he snaps. He finalyl does something. Likely? Not really. But I do find it plausible.
I pretty much agree with what startingater said. But something about tommaclachlan's post brought another theory to mind.
Maybe a lot of this story was showing the cruel truth of how so many people really are, with the cheating on spouses, insensitivity toward so many people and things, broken families, and all of the mean things that people do everyday... And maybe Penns character saw all of these horrible traits in people. And over time grew to hate people (in a Holden Caulfield type of way) and it led to his breaking point. And he just happened to take it out on this girl.
Now of course, I'm still more of a believer that this was caused by his frustrations toward his wife... but the other idea just came to mind so I figured I'd post.
S.C.W.
"We're all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars..."
www.GutterMonkey.com
tommaclachlan lives in a world where an event like this isn't "likely." I would love to live in that world too. In truth, stuff like this happens far, far too often. Psychos aren't the only people who commit terrible crimes. Oftentimes ordinary people lose their minds.
Anton Chigurh is dead and Spider-Man 3 is superior in every way to Funny Games.
[deleted]
Totally agreed and well said. It was a culmination of factors and how he held his emotions in makes the character more believable to me.
share> It also seems weird that her death was described as "death by falling rocks". Wouldn't her friend tell the police what really happened?
Do you think the police would make such a quick press release on a case where they need to determine first whether it was an accident or a murder, and do you think the TV would put that so quickly on the air when the earthquake is already a huge thing to report about?
I don't think so. If that would happen, that would be very unrealistic.
I'm surprised most of you don't 'get it'. He's the killer who killed the young woman and threw her in the river. (the fishermen found her)
Penn's wife just triggered something that was already in him. Hearing her talk dirty to all those men all day, made him feel sexually inadequate. As when the black man confronts him at the bar, Penn does nothing. Like most serial killers, their shy on the surface, but sick inside.
Whoa. Hold on. What makes you say he killed the girl in the river?
shareYou need to cite sources or elaborate on that statement. To me that is just your opinion. Nowhere is it evident that he killed the girl that the fisherman found.
shareIsn't there a part in the movie where Chris Penn and Robert Downey Jr. are laughing about some 'girl in the water' ???
I haven't seen this in quite a while, but I seem to remember that.....
you totally miss the point.
during the earthquake the fisherman is in the pool with her clown wife and friends at the party in which they cooked the fish he got that day..
so the moment of the earthquake is some day after the body in the river scene...
I do not think he is the killer of the girl in the river - that idea is pretty ridiculous. Serial killers tend to be pretty methodical and the acute snap he has against the girl would be out of character, as well as a different method than the other girl (rape and strangulation). I think the girl reminded him of his wife (very similar physical features) and he finally did to the girl what he has wanted to do to his wife for a long time. He has grown to hate his wife for her phone sex with strange men, her vulgarity in front of the children, etc. He hates his life and his job and is ready to snap. Look at the way he looks at her in the bedroom when he asks her why she doesn't talk like that to him and she sort of blows him off. Chris Penn gives the performance of his career as an ordinary man driven to insanity. I agree it seems a bit jarring and unusual for him to lose it like he did. Leave it to Altman to leave it to us how the three of them concocted the story of her being killed by the falling rocks. We will never know. I think the corpse exists in the movie to show the callousness of the fishermen, as well as their strangeness (the old weirdo took pictures). It also could personify the objectification of women (not long before they were staring at Lily Tomlin's ass in the diner). I do not believe we have 'totally missed the point' - the first murdered girl does say something about sexual power and violence (a theme throughout the movie) but I really don't think it has to do with Chris Penn.
Check out my AFI top 100 movie blog www.myspace.com/moviemann
startingater, your post is great - and one thing about Penn's character Jerry in particular. I've seen this movie several times and it always bothers me that she's doing her phone sex job with her children watching TV or crying; she's even changing diapers in one scene; it's unbelievable to me that she would do that with her children around and I understand that she has to take care of them until her husband gets home.
But I agree that their mechanical sex/no-sex life and her job and her insensitivity to whether the children hear what she's saying or not increase the rage and pressure within Jerry until he finally explodes. His explosion is a lot like the earthquake. I think he felt that the girl was rejecting him like every other woman has, and he just could not take it anymore.
"...truth against the world..." - attributed to Boudicca of the Iceni
It looked like he was going to snap the entire movie. Nearly every scene he was in would end with the camera zooming in to his face looking furious and upset. Most other scenes end with transitions to other scenes through objects or music or Altman zooms in on other things, like a glass of milk or a fish. With Chris Penn's scenes, the buildup shows on his face and Altman makes sure we notice it... it seemed to me there was more than enough foreshadowing that he would do that.
shareAgreed, in fact i was expecting Chris Penn to snap at several points in the movie and he didnt. I'm also inclined to believe however that he DID kill the girl in the water. For one, i'm not sure about this because of Altman's multiple-conversation style, but i do seem to recall Robert Downey describing, well, pretty much the dead girl.
Also, in this type of film where there is just so much room for interpretation and interconnection of plots, it might be difficult to convincingly connect all the dots, but i think that if the girl-in-water had not been included at all (hypothetically speaking), the Chris Penn murder would have been much less convincing and much more random.
We are almost primed for sexual violence against women by the girl's corpse, and the murder of the other girl at the end seems like a continuation of this.
I also think it's stupid to say "oh, serial killers have type A profile, and Chris Penn isn't this type A, therefore he isn't a serial killer". Nonsense, there's no rules to this kind of thing, or anything in life really, as i believe the film illustrates.
Then there's the photo-mix up with one of the fishing buddies, where the women see photos of the dead girl and the other guy sees photos of Robert Downey's fake killing of his wife. At that point in the film, i for one was like, holy *beep* the old guy did it (which makes no sense why he would photograph a corpse in a crime scene instead of before, but anyways).... But for me the clue that the guy who actually did it may have been Chris Penn, with her in the car, her married husband..... well that's just too juicy a connection to pass up
"Then there's the photo-mix up with one of the fishing buddies, where the women see photos of the dead girl and the other guy sees photos of Robert Downey's fake killing of his wife. At that point in the film, i for one was like, holy *beep* the old guy did it (which makes no sense why he would photograph a corpse in a crime scene instead of before, but anyways).... But for me the clue that the guy who actually did it may have been Chris Penn, with her in the car, her married husband..... well that's just too juicy a connection to pass up"
I think you're reading too much into this. Part of what Altman is suggesting is that ordinary mishaps like this can take on a great deal more meaning but I don't think he's interested in who killed the girl in the water. And there's very, very little evidence to support that theory. The old fisherman saw the pictures of the wife in make-up beat up and got the phone number probably to try and blackmail them in case they went to the police about the girl in the water photographs. That's it...
I took him as someone who felt teased by the female gender. He even said he didn't want to run after the cyclists and called them teases for simply riding by. Toss in his wife and the cellist he watches skinny dip and he could have serious pathos.
shareI think startingaters account is pretty good, but I wouldn't exactly put Chris Penn's character down as an "ordinary man". I think he's a man with a very low level of empathy and emotional intelligence (OK, some people would regard that as ordinary I guess...). He snaps because he can't make sense of the way the women he meets behave, and distinguish between female fantasy figures as peddled by the media and real women.
The failure of men and women to understand each other is a theme of the whole film and can can also be seen in the fishing story (thematically but not directly connected), and the Robbins/Stowe and Modine/Moore stories.
I used to want to change the world. Now I just want to leave the room with a little dignity.
[deleted]
You know, honestly i came to that conclusion having finished watching the movie.
shareWell, you're wrong.
Anton Chigurh is dead and Spider-Man 3 is superior in every way to Funny Games.
"I'm surprised most of you don't 'get it'. He's the killer who killed the young woman and threw her in the river. (the fishermen found her)
Penn's wife just triggered something that was already in him. Hearing her talk dirty to all those men all day, made him feel sexually inadequate. As when the black man confronts him at the bar, Penn does nothing. Like most serial killers, their shy on the surface, but sick inside."
Well, that is actually what I thought and it isn't a ''ridiculous idea'' like some of the members claim.
The fact is that Chris Penn could be the killer of the girl in the river; he may be a serial killer who takes out his pent up sexual frustration and disdain for his wife's job and lack of love life out on women, I see no reason why he cannot be the killer when he kills the woman in the end.
The good think about the film is that it just doesn't tell you so in your mind you can believe that he is or isn't but neither beliefs are ridiculous.
"Namu-myoho-renge-kyo"
Serial killers, as a rule, are very careful and calculating and it´s extremely improbable they´d lose their calm the way Penn does in the end, having a go at the chick in broad daylight with an eyewitness standing a few meters away... plus his own folks close by. It don´t really gel at all.
"facts are stupid things" - Ronald Reagan
I wouldn't call it ridiculous, but it's highly unlikely. First of all, we are given no indication at any point in the film that would suggest Penn's character has killed before. And second, Penn's whole story is essentially about him building up to his breaking point. His crime was a crime of passion, not pre-meditated.
shareBthggttitss is ABSOLUTLEY right, penn's character killed the river girl, ...when he zones out on lori singer doin dead mans float, in the poo,l is the first big clue....but he's not a "serial killer" ...HE'S A FIRST TIME "RELEASE" KILLER. In his mind, he's being left out of a exciting sex world, that everyone else seems part of. I.E. ...robert downeys. HUSTLER LETTERS sex stories....his wifes work...jazz club joes swsger ..as these frustrations build, he's headin' towards "release" again ....the girls at the park.....and, in lifes weird irony, it seems he's gonna get away with it ..courtesy of the SAN ANDREAS FAULT! !!!
Perhaps he was the killer.
share[deleted]
Serial killers, as a rule, are very careful and calculating and it´s extremely improbable they´d lose their calm the way Penn does in the end, having a go at the chick in broad daylight with an eyewitness standing a few meters away... plus his own folks close by. It don´t really gel at all.
I have never read of any serial killer that commits his murders openly as a result of some kinda temper tantrum or a hissy fit. If that were the so-called M.O., they wouldn´t even "graduate" beyond the first kill.
There´s no indication whatsoever that Penn had ever killed anyone before - some people just like kooky conspiracy theories, the idea that there is some kinda underlying system or a plan or a pattern to everything that happens, that everything is somehow secretly interconnected, maybe even controlled, both in film and in reality.
Short Cuts is about random chance of mundane existence, not that everything is somehow mysteriously related; there is no complex web of connections purposefully hidden away from the viewer.
"facts are stupid things" - Ronald Reagan
I think we're assuming that the girl in the water was a premeditated serial killer type murder. For all we know, she could've also been killed in a crime of impulse just like what happened at the end. In that case it's very possible that Penn did it.
I also concluded at the end that Penn was the killer, but only because of the nature of the film. Think about it, every single character and subplot was interconnected in some way to something else. I felt that was what Altman was going for. But if none of the characters killed the lady in the water, that would be the one and only plot point that is TOTALLY random. Yeah it made for a small comedic moment with the pictures, but I don't think that would've sufficed by itself. Narratively there HAD to be a larger connection between the dead woman and another subplot. What I took away is that Penn was that connection. Again, the biggest opposition seems to be that serial killers wouldn't be impulsive like that in broad daylight, and I say we don't even know if the first murder wasn't impulsive as well.
In that case, to whom are the blacks in the bar connected besides Leigh/Penn etc table? To whom was Lovett´s baker connected besides McDowell & her hubby?Oh and besides, the corpse in the water of course has a visual link with Singer playing dead in the pool.
"facts are stupid things" - Ronald Reagan
You're denying the obvious. At one point in the movie, we are shown a woman who was murdered, later we see Chris Penn commit a murder... screenwriters do not just put random things into their movies without meaning or relevance... YES CHRIS PENN IS THE *beep* KILLER!!! Quit being willfully dense.
"Dick Laurent is dead."
Yup, and we shouldn't forget people are actually dying left and right around Chris Penn, the neighbourhood's angel of death. Doesn't it seem quite obvious, in hindsight, that it was actually him that caused Lori Singer's death, making it look like suicide? And wouldn't it have been rather easy to sneak into little Casey's hospital room, to give him something that made sure he'll never wake up again? I mean, after all, the "screenwriters" are so impossibly CLEVER that there's clearly an elaborate pattern of murderous underworld activity just beneath the surface that connects everybody and everything. That's what the film is really about - complex, intricate ways of whacking people.
"facts are stupid things" - Ronald Reagan
Not sure if anybody's mentioned this and I could be wayyyy reading into things, but as far as Penn's character killing the girl in the lake, during the party at Downey's neighbors house, Downey mentions "wet p-ssy", to which Penn says "I know all about that", and then both guys crack up. Could be a nod to the girl in the lake.
share[deleted]
I read this entire thread and nowhere does anyone claiming his character killed the woman in the river think about how the heck the two of them (killer and victim) got there.
It's a FOUR HOUR hike in to that spot on the river (plus ANOTHER four hours to get back out). This is the rationale the fisherman use for not reporting the body right away. Does Penn (and by extrapolation, his character) look like the kind of person who would conduct an eight hour hike for ANY reason? And let's say he did hike four hours in. He then just randomly found a woman and killed her? Maybe you feel it wasn't random. Maybe she hiked in with him. Why would she do that? If there was any connection between the two he would have quickly become a "person of interest". Maybe you think she didn't hike in with him; that he killed her beforehand then dumped the body there. Even if you find it conceivable that he would have hiked eight hours, does anybody think he would have hiked four hours while carrying a body, just to dispose of it so poorly?
"My name is Paikea Apirana, and I come from a long line of chiefs stretching all the way back to the Whale Rider."
My first thought that he was the one who killed the girl in the river. There was no real evidence for it but it just struck me that as everyone in this film was somehow loosely connected, Chris Penn being the killer tied up that loose end and 'completed the circle' if you like.
Also he killed the bike girl so quickly and for no apparent reason that i'm not convinced by the 'he just snapped' argument. I find it quite inconceivable that that was his first attack on a woman.
Wtf is this - "for no apparent reason"? I wouldn´t want to be rude, but maybe you should really pay more attention to what you´re watching. And yes, he did "snap" right there and then; the theory of him being a serial killer continues to be a blatantly ridiculous fantasy.
"facts are stupid things" - Ronald Reagan
Yeah, my thoughts exactly. I figured that was a way to tie him into the circle of the story even more so. However, I felt like it was a bit rushed. I still thought it was great though.
Was he a psycho because of his wife occupation that finally drove him mental? Hearing her talk dirty all day to dudes and then she won't do anything kinky with him. Maybe he felt angry and sexually deprived.
You're not a writer Fink, you're a goddamn write off
Not just his wife - Downey Jr also seemed to have a habit of calling him from work to talk about sex and loose women.
"facts are stupid things" - Ronald Reagan
He didn't just snap. The implication is that he's the serial killer that killed the girl in the river. That's the implication that has also been suggested by several plot summaries of this movie. The filmmaker chose to hold back details...doesn't mean that he just suddenly snapped. Serial killers aren't always methodical and organized and smarter than everyone. That's just the Hollywood version of it. A lot of them devolve, are stupid and inept and insignificant in life. Sometimes they aren't caught (not because they are so organized) but because people do not want to believe that someone would commit that type of depravity and just overlook it. Like the cop that lets a car go or doesn't follow up on a disturbance call....the neighbor that hears something, but goes back to sleep anyway.
shareHe was (obviously) the serial killer.
share