Confused
So, tell me again why did they call this movie, "Romeo Is Bleeding" when they didn't even have a character named Romeo?? And who the heck is supposed to be Romeo in this movie?
share[deleted]
Don't you ever read poems or anything like that?
Romeo is Jack, though is never says in the movie that he is Romeo (Unless you count the biggest clue where the when Jack comes out of the building and the old man sitting on the chair yells, "Romeo!!! Did she confess????" and laughs)
it's not hard to know Jack is Romeo, seeing as he's the leading character in the story and he's an all around Ken doll.
The title for the movie was based on the song, "Romeo is bleeding." The movie came AFTER the song, there for that is how the name came about.
Though Jack does bleed in the movie the title means more of less about Jack having a hard time in this situation of his during it, trying to catch Mona, Natlie leaving him, so in a way he's not physically bleeding but emotionally inside.
The title is like a poem in itself.
Get it?
Big in 06 awards for best breakthrough: Stephen Colbert, *beep* yeah!!!
Riiiight (Dr. Evil's famous un-enthusiastic agreement). Hm, what a whack reason to call it Romeo is Bleeding. Maybe they should have called it, "Jack Is Bleeding." Let's get characters name right, dammit. LOL. But oh well, the movie is already been made, so what, who cares now? Oky-doky, pal. Thanks for the info.
share[deleted]
and then there's te one about "snakes in planes"
competition: invent literal names for movies and whoever guesses first wins a kilo of 'caster sugar' and the "personally extended (Again) Redux Reeeeduxed" version of Apololypse Now, with a personal introduction from - AND BOOK written by to accompany the DVD 6-disc Special Edition - Zoetrope ubermeister Colin Firth!!!!! (in the mode of Kermit the Frog)