I don't understand how this constitutes "political correctness". The fact that Demme elected to go for something that was outside the norm on a minute detail over the film, as in his family members who may have all of about 20 minutes of screen time (from your position. I have many gay friends and can't say that the great majority of them have severely flawed parents. Their parents tend to be accepting and very supportive. One I know got married to her partner out here in California this past Summer and her parents wrote very glee induced posts about her union on Facebook), doesn't mean he produced this great picture under the myopic lens that is PC cinema.
I'd understand your position if everyone was on Hanks' character's side. However, that wasn't the case. You see the protests outside the courthouse with one side exuding intolerance and the other professing compassion towards the GLBT community (I'd obviously be on this side as I'm a huge LGBT advocate, even if I'm straight. Both sides, as evidenced by the movie, have roughly equal supporters). There are the scenes as well where the law firm bigots wold mock, tease, utter nasty sentiments about gay people in general, Denzel's character on a couple occasions isn't all that warm/fuzzy towards Hanks' plight (think the moment when he's cooking dinner with his wife. I don't include when Washington's character goes to get his blood checked, as I don't consider that homophobic. He's being proactive and, in 1993, the research still wasn't quite as advanced on treating AIDS, although it made strides from the 1980s. Plus, the knowledge on the spread wasn't as robust either).
When God made Tom Cruise, he was only joking.
reply
share