Hi crustysalty. Yeah, I paraphrased you, but then you completely missed the point of my post. I think we all know that this is your OPINION because that is what this site is made up of - opinions. And, as the man said, opinions are like *beep* we all have one. ( Theres probably something else there about being full of crap, but you can add that punchline yourself.
So we know that this is your OPINION and not an objective fact about the movie, what I would like to know is why this is your OPINION. And the further point I was making is that you told us you are a film studies student at degree level, so I was highlighting your inability to construct a cohesive, coherent critical argument about these OPINIONS you hold, and what this in turn says about both yourself, and the level of expectation of film studies undergraduates.
This is not even touching on the fact that any intelligent person willing to engage in an argument is prepared to, if necessary, change their OPINION.
Plus the bottom line is, you are very easy to wind up, which is fun because you then post stuff about cretinous morons, or moronous cretins, without being able to see that it is you, in fact, who has missed the point. Oh the irony! Hence this little message. I wasn't going to reply to you, but felt that, being accused of cretinous morony, or moronous cretiny, I ought to give you some back.
Why don't you reply, and then its like practice for one of your essays!
Morleys - re the zeitgeist. No, this is where you don't get as much depth as in the novel. You get the feeling that Orlando just happens to be in a different time ( or period ), rather than reflecting any particular spirit of the age. The closest is a scene where Orlando is at a tea part with Pope and, I think, Swift and Addison, but this is a scene invented by Potter that condenses many different moments in the novel into one event in the film, and even here you get the sense that Orlando is responding to the manners and mores of the time rather than forming or representing the zeitgeist.
I know someone who has also read the novel, and has just seen the film, and they feel the same way as I do - nice film, looks stunning, but doesn't quite capture the book in the way you would like.
reply
share