The Terrain at Little Round Top
Was the terrain on July 2, 1863 the same on Little Round Top as depicted in the film? For some reason, I think it was more barren.
shareWas the terrain on July 2, 1863 the same on Little Round Top as depicted in the film? For some reason, I think it was more barren.
shareI'll try to find this little piece of info. LTR was pretty barren around the front of it because the owner had been cutting timber since spring. The area between the two hills and the flank where the 20th Maine was posted was still wooded. I've read a couple of books and several articles on Gettysburg in the past few months, but I do recall reading that.
When we visited the park in '95 it was very barren, as Hood called it, "that rocky little hill." Of course this was just a couple of years after the movie was made.
Do you hate me because I have no avatar? Do you even give a damn?
I'd appreciate it. I'm so curious to know what the terrain was. It makes quite a difference if it was heavily wooded or partially or barren.
I'm hoping the way it was depicted in the film is historically correct.
I can't find the reference to the logging, but pictures and drawings in Edward Stackpole's book "They Met at Gettysburg" the eastern approaches looked pretty barren with a small stand of trees at its base, but no trees on the slope itself. By his description, BRT, the saddle and the south side of LRT were so woody that units positioned on that side couldn't lend supporting fire to each other.
I'll keep looking for the logging statement.
So, as I understand it, the bottom of the hill was barren but the top was, as in the film, right?
shareNo, the western slope which faced toward Devil's Den, the wheat field, the peach orchard and the Confederate lines was barren and rocky pretty much all the way to where General Warren and the Signal Corps detachment were originally, almost to the ridge. The southern slope was moderately wooded, and the southeastern slope, now known as Vincent's Spur, was thickly wooded all the way to the ridge. The position of the 20th Maine at the extreme tip of Vincent's Spur isn't more than about 50 to 75 yards from Warren's position, but there is that drastic a contrast in vegetation.
shareVery interesting. I wonder what the terrain was EAST of the 20th Maine. It makes me think that the 20th Maine, being the last regiment on the eastern flank, was made the last defensive position due to the growth there compared to the regiments west of the 20th Maine who were stationed on barren ground.
That the tactics involved was not to have the extreme flank on barren ground but instead to have the furthest regiment holding a wooded position.
So, again, I wonder what was to the east of the 20th Maine. Another question is why the confederate army didn't try to go east of the 20th Maine. Their tactic of head-on attacking, round after round, seems senseless. Instead of a head-on confrontation why didn't they try to go totally around the 20th Maine on their eastern side and outflanking the whole Union left flank? Was it because of the terrain east of the 20th Maine???
Remember that, just as the 20th Maine was the far left of the Federal line, the troops facing them (mainly the 15th Alabama) were the far right of the Confederate. To have moved farther right, they would have to have broken contact with the rest of their brigade and headed out into what was essentially unknown terrain. They had no idea what was out there or how many Federal reinforcements might have been coming up; in fact, the Federal 5th Corps was arriving on the field, with (IIRC) the 6th behind them. The nearest source of Confederate reinforcements, the rest of Hood's Division, was quite some distance away and already heavily engaged. It would have been reckless in the extreme to have gone farther right.
http://redkincaid.com
Observations: The attack on the Union left was carried out by too few southern troops. If they couldn't outflank the union left, then they also hadn't scouted what was to the left of the 20th Maine. This proves even more how Lee shouldn't of fought at Gettysburg. In relation to the Union army, the South had too few troops. If they had enough troops, then the Southern right flank could've outnumbered the Union left at Little Round Top. Its either this, or the Southern troops were not deployed correctly on July 2nd. Lee had simply not provided enough men for the attack on the Union left flank.
This could mean that even if the 20th Maine had collapsed and the Southern right flank attacked the Union army from this side, they wouldn't have had enough men to disperse the rest of the Union army, due to mathematics. Plus the 15th Alabama had been marching all day to come into position and were quite tired by the time their attack was started. And of course, they were charging up a hill.
In other words, Lee underestimated the amount of Union troops on the Union left (and the whole Union army)flank and didn't provide enough manpower to succeed on July 2nd. This and Pickett's Charge are 2 examples of how Lee wasted his manpower and southern troops were massacered for no military reason.
Wasn't this that Longstreet had warned Lee about on the morning of July 2nd? To pick another place to do battle?
The more I learn about Gettysburg, the more I realize that Lee totally wasted many southern lives by insisting on fighting here. I know in a way he was forced to fight here, but he let himself be carried away and should've picked better ground.
I guess he was desperate but attacking the Union left flank so late in the day with tired troops also proves he lost the sense of reality of this battlefield.
Salmonit, if you can get Volume 2 of Shelby Foote's Civil War trilogy, just read Ch. 5, "The Stars in Their Courses." IMO it's one of the better tellings of the events surrounding the Gettysburg campaign that gives enough detail without being overwhelming in minutae to make it a thorough telling. If you saw Shelby Foote in that PBS-Ken Burns Civil War program from the '90s, he's just as interesting to read as he is to listen to.
Stephen Sears' "Gettysburg" is more detailed, and also a good read.
Do you hate me because I have no avatar? Do you even give a damn?
I remember Shelby Foote very well from that documentary. He was incredibly interesting to listen to and really captured ones imagination.
I will do what I can to find it. I should read the whole collection of his
One day I gotta get to Gettysburg! Hopefully next summer.
He reads just like he sounds. I'm rereading the trilogy for the third time, am about 3/4 through vol. 1 now.
Hopefully you can find it at a library or if lucky, the whole trilogy at a used book store.
Do you hate me because I have no avatar? Do you even give a damn?
I actually went to Gettysburg back at the end of September in 2007 and the Tour Guide told us (me and my Dad) that the battle of Little Round Top in the movie was not actually filmed at the actual Little Round Top sight. I've actually seen the sight and it looks nothing like the movie. It was woody and grassy and but it wasn't as steep and hilly as it looks in the movie. Also the bottom of the hill didn't have trees around it when I went there. Though way back in 1863 it's possible it looked completely different and may have looked more like the movie.
When the Story Lady tells us about the naughty boy who blew up his goldfish.
but it wasn't as steep and hilly
I read somewhere that the filming was at a farm about 5 miles west of Gettysburg, but I can't recall if they said exactly where.
From the 20th Maine monument on LRT, a low stone wall runs east; in the movie they're behind fence rails. Also, a modern 2-lane road runs along the base of the hills that would've been hard to keep out of the shots (IMO.) The movie site was a bit more dramatic to me, though I wouldn't have wanted to be a rebel soldier trying to get up either of them.
I only have one person on ignore, but I've had to ignore him 625 different times.
In the bayonet charge, its very evident that the actors are running very fast down the hill and it looks like it would've been hard to stop if that was really LRT. The real LRT wasn't ss steep as other posters have pointed out so the 20th Maine had it even haarder in reality than in the film. Attacking uphill as in the movie is harder than on a more flat surface.
shareThe real LTR Looks a little steep to me, didn't know that it was so grassy and barren though...
http://hd.housedivided.dickinson.edu/node/27086?size=_original
That IS steep and long. Those poor southern troops! I wondered what they thought when they first arrived there and realized they had to climb it!
Here is the link and it looks like a great website http://hd.housedivided.dickinson.edu/node/27086/zoomify
I volunteered at Gettysburg for several years recently.
Filming of the LRT sequence took place in the woods behind the farm on Pumping Station Road that was used in the film as the field where Pickett's Charge took place and the barn where Gen. Hood was cared for after being wounded. Pumping Station Road itself became Emmitsburg Road in the film thanks to a lot of dirt dumped on it. The barn is right on Pumping Station Road - you can't miss it. The house beside it was never seen in the film but in reality it was a Confederate field hospital - it was rehabbed a few years ago and some medical debris was found.
The real LRT was and is wooded in the area where the 20th Maine was; it was and is barren and rocky on the other side, where Gen. Warren stood and saw the Confederates coming (and where his statue is.
The real 20th Maine's charge was down into a saddle between Big and Little Round Top. Warren Avenue goes through there now.
[deleted]
If you visit the battlefield, it becomes very apparent why Little Round Top was so crucial (and why Round Top really wasn't), as well as why Chamberlain's position and his actions were so critical (though I still think he was a bit of self-promoter). The "front" of Little Round Top (i.e. the portion that, by chance, faced west toward Confederate lines was cleared. It was (and is) rocky as heck so maneuvering troops up there was tough, and artillery was even tougher but it had open fields of fire toward the advancing Confederate lines. This made it impossible for Confederate troops to cross the "Valley of Death" in front of the hill, making it the perfect anchor to the Union line. It also made life real dangerous for any Union officer up there. General Weed, Colonels Vincent and O'Rorke and several other officers as well as a slew of Union artillerymen were killed by Confederate sharpshooters hiding in the rocks at the base of the hill (the infamous "Devil's Den") while defending the hill.
The back side of the hill was, at that time lightly wooded and also rocky (Today, it appears that the backside is actually more densely wooded than it was in 1863). This gave Chamberlain and his men a bit more cover than those troops on the front of the hill. However, it also gave the Confederates cover to approach and make an attack. In the front of the hill, they never got close enough to Union lines to really threaten them. On the back side, where Chamberlain was, they not only reached Union lines, but almost broke through.
That open face would have been just as devastating to the Union had Confederates managed to take the hill. It would have given Confederate artilleryman the ability to see and hit just about any point on the Union line. Oh, Union guns on Culp's and Cemetery Hill would have made it hot (perhaps too hot), but those guns would have also made it too hot for the entirety of the Union line along Cemetery Ridge as well as for their wagons and line of supply stretching back toward Washington.
Round Top, on the other hand, was (and remains) very heavily wooded. As a result, even though it was higher than Little Round Top, it was of limited military value because it did not have open fields of fire. A well-supplied force could have held it for a long time, but they couldn't have done much damage because it would have been virtually impossible to get artillery up there, and, even if they had gotten some guns up there, they would not have been able to fire or see targets due to the trees.
I was looking at a Google map of the Gettysburg battlefield earlier today, and I was pretty upset to learn there's a big gravel pit about a mile due east of Little Round Top. I shake my head at the lack of respect Americans show to their historical grounds.
I only have one person on ignore, but I've had to ignore him 625 different times.
The quarry has been there for quite a while, I think. A lot worse things have been close to or even on the battlefield proper - like that monstrosity of a viewing tower that was about where the current Visitor's Center is. Long,long ago there was actually a trolley that ran near Devil's Den. The quarry at least does not impede the visitor's experience. You really don't see it except on GoogleEarth.
share