well, i hadn't already stated my opinion on this thread. don't star threads unless you are prepared to read opinions you may not agree to.
Louise, I thought we settled this a few months ago: I started the topic back in May, and your reply was the first one recorded--I replied to that reply back in June. I'm sorry if I offended you with that comment (and I have to admit, I may have come across as a bit snippy) but in a later post when I referred to your first reply, I made sure to mention that you had replied in a civil manner, which I appreciated. Looking back, I think I replied to you initially as I did because I was slightly annoyed that the first response on my thread came from a Jack fan, who had already expressed an opinion,
even if it was in another thread. As a matter of fact, I do believe it was that very post of yours that spurred me to start the "Anybody else here..." topic. But again, I apologize for my snippy tone.
I certainly didn't/don't expect everybody to agree with my opinion (gads, how boring endless yea-saying would be!), and if you read a bit further on, you may have noticed that I eventually conceded that Jack was better suited to the seasons/series he co-starred in than Jesse would have been. Here's what I said on that subject:
It seems to me that while Scott Baio was well-suited to the earlier seasons (in Denver), Charlie Schlatter was better-suited to the later ones (in L.A.).
So IMO having such different supporting characters was ultimately good, because it gave the show overall more variety in style and tone than it might otherwise have had.
I do confess, I am a bit curious as to why you would wait until November to protest a comment I made in June.
If we die for them, Harry, I'm going to KILL YOU!
reply
share