Question about the plot. (plothole??)
I watched this movie for the first time today and enjoyed it on the whole. However, I do have a lingering question that might be considered a plot hole. And I didn't see this specific question being discussed on the other threads, so hopefully I'm not just reiterating what others have said.
So up to the hour mark, where Martin has been kidnapped and it's revealed that Cosmo's behind everything and he gives that speech about making everyone equal and no one would be poor or rich, etc. Then, Cosmo goes to his computer desk and explains thoroughly how he will put Martin's DNA on the gun his goons used to kill his Russian friend and his driver, and how it'll show up on all the databases that Martin Brice committed this crime, and the Cosmo puts in the FBI's database that Martin Bishop is his alibi. Cosmo specifically states that tomorrow the gun with the prints will be found and the day after it'll show up that Bishop is an alibi and everyone will be out for Martin. Now, we actually see Martin put the data in and set it up. And, unless I missed something, we as a viewer are lead to believe that this is set to happened, and the chain of events is started as soon as the name "Martin Bishop" is entered into the database. We are not lead to believe that Cosmo is bluffing, but that this set of events is now in motion.
Yet, nothing seems to come out of this, at all. We see the team spend at least two full days to watch Werner Brandes' movements. Wouldn't the FBI be all over Bishop at this point? I was waiting for this to catch up with Martin and his team. But he never even mentions "Oh hey, so Cosmo (who's in charge of this whole scheme, he's not really dead like I thought fyi) has set me up and we should work fast" or anything. Cosmo had the money and the means to keep to his word, the Feds would of easily been able to track down Bishop... This really through me off, because up until this point the movie was mostly believable. Now, I might of gotten this all wrong but could someone tell me if this is a plothole or can be easily explained?