It's the Stephen King kind of thing to have one of the antagonist characters at least have some kind of dark motive or crude intention.
This isn't just exploitation to make a sick and disgusting characters for the sake of making them and drawing in people either who will complain or secretly love it. It's simply the age old tradition of making and breaking even when the death count comes.
For example, the beginning of the movie shows that a little girl, probably an innocent undeserving little thing, had died. Dead cats everywhere...then later on we have the cop die and most likely ( I can't remember precisely) the girl's father dies too...
Then it's just a movie about GOOD people always dying.
Charles could have killed Mr. Fallows regardless, sure, before any kind of attitude was shown from the teacher. But that just would have been another pointless and underserving death.
But by throwing in the fact that the teacher has an unhealthy obsession with a teenage high school boy, as well as full intent of blackmailing the boy into sexual favours, our wonderful Mr. King gives us at least ONE entertaining death scene where someone died because they DID deserve it. It doesn't justify the other deaths, of course, but it leaves us with the fact that no one was safe, there weren't only innocent virginal or heroic victims.
It also served as a plot point to show how truly two-sided Charles' personality could be, and that no matter how much he had charmed the audience already as well as the girl in the movie, that he was still ultimately a vicious, maniacal monster with the intent and ability to kill.
So it serves as a plot point, at least ONE death to even out the fact so many good people were killed, and a device to make the audience just that little less guilty while they were probably rooting for the girl to be killed :P
reply
share