MovieChat Forums > Howards End (1993) Discussion > In Defense of Leonard Bast

In Defense of Leonard Bast


I've noticed a number of the posts ravage Leonard Bast. Well, I'm here to defend him!

The story is set into motion with two actions, both by Helen: Her premature engagement, soon broken, to Paul Wilcox, and her inadvertent "pinching" of Leonard Bast's umbrella. It is the latter that initiates the relationship of Bast and the Schlegel sisters. Bast is obviously concerned only with the retrieval of his umbrella; on his meager salary, he can ill-afford to purchase a new one. But the Schlegel sisters see this accidental collision between their lives and his as a way of connecting with and perhaps assisting him. They are well-intentioned, but of course Forster wants us to see that good intentions can go awry, sometimes tragically so, and so it is with Leonard Bast.

Now, is Leonard Bast "creepy"? No! He merely wants his umbrella back so he might return to Jacky; instead he is overwhelmed with Schlegel hospitality. But Leonard is also aspiring to a better life. He isn't after anyone's money—he's too proud for that, as is later shown. But he does seek intellectual, emotional and spiritual (non-secular) enrichment. And he realizes the Schlegel sisters, as opposed to Jacky, also seek this out.

Ah, Jacky. Is Bast's involvement with Jacky immoral? Think what you like, but I see Bast as a man who feels a strong sense of moral commitment to Jacky. It's possible, in fact, that she is the only woman—until Helen—with whom he has been sexually involved. Jacky is almost entirely carnal—that's the way her life evolved—but Leonard's feelings for her go beyond that; he not only feels responsible for her in the here-and-now, but also seems to want to make it up to her for the way Life previously buffeted her about. Unfortunately, Jacky cannot appreciate or even take the time to understand Leonard’s yearnings for something more.

So more than a year passes, and then Jacky—jealous of a mere calling card—shows up at the Schlegel's, demanding to know the whereabouts of her husband. (For by this time, Leonard has indeed held to his promise of marrying her.) Once Bast learns of Jacky's embarrassing visit, he returns to the Schlegel's to politely apologize. But then Helen challenges him with her own cheeky (perhaps rude is the better word) assumption, and Bast—already stressed and humiliated—defends himself, reveals his yearnings for something less plebian than what he already has. So what's wrong with that?

Bast refuses the patronage of the Schlegel sisters at several points. The Schlegels are for him not a source of money or social climbing but a window to what he is seeking: Something beyond the dreariness of day-to-day life. He is uncomfortable with the thought that he might be imposing upon them, but still cannot fail to appreciate that they follow the intellectual and spiritual quests that also beckon to him.

I think Samuel West plays Leonard wonderfully well. No, Bast is not a knight-in-shining-armor . . . in fact he is, in many respects, a very ordinary young man. But he does aspire to something better. This is what the Schlegels recognize, and their own intellectual instincts and moral training—not to mention natural kindness and generosity—cannot help but support Mr. Bast's quest.

For awhile I could not bear to watch the scenes with Leonard, knowing what was to become of him. And even now I find it difficult to see him being turned away from places of employment. I see in Leonard Bast a principled if stubborn young man who seeks escape from the routine and development of both his intellect and his soul. He doesn’t have the grace or elegance of the men within the Schlegels' class milieu, but so what? He has heart. And the yearning for something more. No wonder Margaret and Helen find him a romantic figure, worthy of their friendship and assistance!

reply

I watched this again recently and I must say I was more sympathetic toward him. I thought he was creepy because he just looked that way. Didn't really focus on the character at all and watch the story with his point of view in mind. I did just that the last time I watched it and all I could feel was compassion. Didn't really care that he cheated on Jacky. Not sure if they were married or not. But it just felt wrong to me. It wasn't totally on him because Helen initiated it.

reply

I think the reason Leonard Bast comes off as a little strange is because . . . well, he IS strange! Or perhaps the better word would be unusual. He's trying to work his way up the ladder, rather than accepting status quo. Even today a great deal of people are inclined to accept rather than challenge the system. But in post-Edwardian England, acceptance of one's station was very much the norm.

What's interesting about Leonard is that he's not so much interested in monetary gain as he is in developing his intellectual and spiritual side. He has a hunger for knowledge and understanding that the Schlegel sisters find attractive, given that they too are on this quest.

All the same, Bast isn't going for financial and social parity. (Which is ironic, given the eventual financial and social inheritance of his son.) He is well aware of his "place" and I think that accounts for his initial manner around the Schlegels--shy, awkward, and verging on subservient--which makes him less-than-attractive. Gradually he becomes more comfortable with the sisters, but he's still stuck in the conventions of the day. Moreover, he's keenly aware that the Schlegels have money and he does not--those sidelong glances betray his discomfort--and whenever he feels they are about to extend him charity it makes him uneasy, sometimes to the point of surliness. So again, Leonard's not the continually chipper young chap we're used to seeing in stock depictions of this period, but someone who has feelings and sensitivities as to who he is and what sort of assistance--if any--he can accept. In a word, he is complex!

And yes, by the time he and Helen make love, Leonard is married. As a moral young man--if not exactly a "gentelman" by the standards of the day--he has made good on his promise to Jacky and, in keeping with his new role as a settled young husband, has grown a mustache. But after prolonged unemployment, then the humiliation at Eve's wedding reception, Leonard's defenses are just about worn through. And who better to administer the final "Timber!" than Helen, who is filled with righteous indignation at what has happened to the Basts. The subsequent interlude on the river is not a seduction on the part of either Helen or Leonard but a natural progression based on mutual despair and frustration.

reply

Wonderfully insightful posts. Samuel West was nominated for a BAFTA for this film, should have been for an Oscar too. A fascinating performance.

reply

Thank you for your posts.

I just rewatched the movie and I still have the same impression from my first viewing many years back.

I have a lot of sympathy for Leonard and even Jacky. However mismatched they are, the Basts are honest with each other - he reads and goes to cultural meetings and she has a past. They have a livelihood no matter how meager and they're minding their own business and appear to be devoted to each other. Who's to say that this couple has no future and stability?

I wish he has never cross paths with the Schlegels who make me cringe with their hospitality attempts with anybody.

Or at least he does not take the advice. But that's the key plot point that sets off a series of unfortunate events for the three families.






Billy Wilder Page, Play the Movie Smiley Game
www.screenwritingdialogue.com

reply