I agree with the others, but have my own take on this. Howard's End represents England. The main conflict in the story is Who will inherit England. Of course that is meant in the broader historical and symbolic sense, not the strictly legal, but it is portrayed in the story by the dispute over who will gain legal title to the estate. The Schlegels inherit it. The story begins with them losing their home, but it is not a real hereditary estate in the traditional sense, they have been renting, so they spend the whole story looking for new digs. Mrs. Wilcox, as the original owner of Howard's End, understands that Margaret is the right person to inherit, and ultimately she proves right. Although the Wilcox's have the legal right to keep it (Mrs. Wilcox's note was not legally binding as it was not a will), they end up messing up through their greed and arrogance. They don't actually want to live in the place, but they want to possess it, or better yet, they don't want the Schlegels to have it. They lease it to someone, and won't even let Helen stay in it for a single night. Also, this fuss over keeping the Schlegels out of Howard's End leads indirectly to Leonard Bast's tragic death (although another line in the plot contributes). Ultimately Mr. Wilcox is so broken by the turn of events that he doesn't want to lose Margaret and is willing to give her Howard's End. The comment about the furniture fitting suggests that, symbolically, they are the rightful heirs of the house, and of England. It's like a Dickens novel where the poor lost orphan is discovered to be the rightful heir to a huge fortune.
reply
share