MovieChat Forums > Forever Young (1992) Discussion > Cute premise badly executed

Cute premise badly executed


It would have been nice if they understood something about 1939 America. This is back in the day when a man could still be considered a gentleman without everyone saying he was a "wuss." Daniel wasn't shocked by the short skirts, Claire walking around with her blouse undone and her bra showing, children swearing, Claire swearing -- heck, EVERYONE swearing. Maybe after he was told Claire wouldn't mind a strange man staying overnight in her home, he figured she moonlighted. By 1939 standards, she acted like it.

He wasn't stunned by the automobiles, the light switches that didn't make a noise when you flipped them, the weird looking phones or any of the appliances in the kitchen. He'd seen a television at the World's Fair -- with a tiny screen, blurry picture and in black and white, but he took a 32" color TV with cable in stride. And when he looks through the coffee table book on American history, he does so with the same kind of idle curiosity that you or I would exhibit, even when he thumbs quickly through the second World War that he missed, and the dropping of the atomic bomb.

In 1939, he'd be more likely to be living on the air base than in his own home, and eating at the mess hall than becoming a good cook. He's head over heels in love with a woman he grew up with, and he looks like he's at least his mid-thirties -- she would have to be the same -- and she waited for him all that time rather than giving up on a guy who couldn't commit? If you listen to the music from those days, it's all about falling in love and getting married. That was the norm. The guys who didn't want to get married were the weirdos. Grown ups settled down, got married and had children. It was the American dream until a few decades ago.

This was a movie about the 1930's from a writer who didn't know anything about the time. It was a movie that should have had culture shock, but since it was intent on being a romance it didn't have the culture shock common sense would have included.

Back when it came out, Mel Gibson could sell anything. Women would drag their boyfriends to see him just so they could swoon uncritically, so studios wouldn't think twice about putting him in a half-baked script like this. Mel's uncritical swoon factor is largely gone, and we're reminded that the only thing he played convincingly as he sleepwalked his way through this movie was anger as he was threatening the airman.

Once upon a time, I thought Mel Gibson hung the moon, and I probably would have loved this then. A couple hours ogling Mel Gibson? What's not to like?

Sadly, things have changed, and I could take my eyes off Gibson's then gorgeous face long enough to notice the flaws in the script and his acting.


Just because I don't have patience for obviously false beliefs doesn't mean I'm intolerant.

reply

Hi, stalker! How's it going, buddy? I've missed you, you sad, lonely git.

reply

For a rom-com it isn't bad. But I too took stars away for poor execution and plot holes. He was madly in love with his sweetheart, the son looking for a Dad, Jamie Lee looking for love. However all the relationships seemed forced. The science seemed intriguing. I gave it 6 stars.


"...as long as people can change, the world can change"

reply

I was okay with the movie up until the ending which seemed to throw away too much of the context of everything that came before it. Firstly, the story line didn't really require having Nat (Elijah Wood)go along for the ride in the B-25. And having him holding hands at the very end was just kinda odd. My ending, (just a lame example) would have had Daniel not as sick but aware that he's aging quickly and running out of time. So he steals a plane (how about a Stearman PT-17?) late at night, (maybe flashes back to the tree house flight lesson helping him recall where various instruments are or something..?), finds the light house along the coast just at dawn, lands on the beach and ends up with Helen. What happens with Claire, the boys and the AF/FBI/cavalry at that point is then wide open for just about any schmaltzy ending scene you can think of but at least everyone's place in the story can be resolved. I gave this film a 6, just barely.

reply

I actually agree with you Mary but the movie's emphasis is unfortunately on the romance and the mel Gibson swoon factor and not the differences between america in 1939 and 1992
The only thing is why cast an unknown like Isabel glasser???

reply

There were many moments of culture shock portrayed. It sounds like you wanted the whole film to be about him being surprised at everything, which would not have helped the narrative.

And how exactly would your light switch scene have played out? Man flips switch and acts amazed? Wow that would've been a real show-stopper.

The BTTF trilogy had a similar amount of culture shock and nobody ever made silly little lists about what they should have put in.

reply