Seems like a lot of bare boobs for a PG-13 rated movie
Or am I missing something?
The real world hurts, doesn't it? But you wouldn't know anything about that, would you?
Or am I missing something?
The real world hurts, doesn't it? But you wouldn't know anything about that, would you?
A few scenes but not too much.
Its that man again!!
It's only breasts, not sex. Relax.
share20'S and 30's--lots of bare breasts and clingy dresses without any underwear. That was before the Hayes office and all of its censorship that stultified film in the 50's. Of course, for the past 20's years it's been the opposite--gratuitous nudity and there must be a sex scene in every film (ho hum, snore)
_______________________________________
"ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED??!!"
Maximus Decimus Meridius
This is definitely the most T & A that I've ever seen in a PG-13.
shareI don't understand why it's not PG. Nudity shouldn't give a movie any rating higher than PG except it has a strong sexual content and this movie has almost zero sexual content. MPAA is too much oversensitive in rating films with nudity.
shareI agree. Never seen so many boobs in a PG-13 movie. I thought Titanic was too gratuitous for the MPAA...not realizing this had already been released by then. What other PG/PG-13 movies have this many boobs? I can't think of any.
Mirror inspector is a job I could really see myself doing.
The MPAA was thinking, "Must be great because it's directed by Attenborough the director of Gandhi," failing to appreciate that RA was a mediocre director who was fortunate to make boring movies about the greats who were so fascinating they made up for his mediocrity
shareOnly in your opinion
shareI was just looking at renting this... I'm totally surprised this isn't rated R!! Seriously, not ok.
share