MovieChat Forums > Bram Stoker's Dracula (1992) Discussion > Does the idea of Dracula being a romanti...

Does the idea of Dracula being a romantic hero bother anyone else?


Right off the bat in the original book the scene where Dracula makes Mina drink his blood is representative of, if not actually, sexual assault (which was probably intended by Stoker given the sexual imagery going on with vampires).

"His right hand gripped her by the back of the neck, forcing her face down on his bosom. Her white nightdress was smeared with blood, and a thin stream trickled down the man’s bare breast which was shown by his torn-open dress. The attitude of the two had a terrible resemblance to a child forcing a kitten’s nose into a saucer of milk to compel it to drink.”


He's pinning her against his chest as she's struggling against him in an attempt not to drink it. Afterwards much is made of how she feels 'unclean' and 'soiled' as to what has happened to her.

So the whole idea of making Dracula in love with Mina and she in return has always bothered me. We actually have the aforementioned scene in this film except it's depicted as erotic and consensual as opposed to him violating her.

Obviously this is intended to be a different interpretation of an old story but at the end of the day it's basically turning a rape scene into a love one.

reply

Nah. Historical events aren't even immune from artistic reinterpretation, so fiction is definitely fair game.

reply

No!

At least he didn't sparkle! :-)

reply

The whole movie is set up as a love story between Mina and Dracula.

I really don't see why it's a problem when they set it up ahead of time. It wouldn't make sense for her to say "I want to be like you" and then resist him when he gives in.

The new home of Welcome to Planet Bob: http://kingofbob.blogspot.ca/

reply

[deleted]

I really like the film, but yes, Dracula tortures and murders people and is romantic hero? Stoker is spinning in his grave.

reply

You're right, Dracula was not a romantic character in the book at all but Coppola's film made him one in order to focus on the origin of the character and trigger the story into following exactly how the novel was although some parts such as the origin of the character as being the (real-life) Romanian Price Vlad Teppes was not part of the book but was one of the many references to the elements that make us think of Dracula and Vlad's title Dracula (meaning son of the Dragon) was used by Bram Stoker for the villain of his book instead of 'Wampyr'

reply

Bran Stoker’s original name for the vampire was going to be “Fangman.” His assistant tipped him off to the historical Vlad Tepes/Dracul figure and suggested the change in name to the English translation “Dracula.”

reply

This I did not know in addition

reply

He has a tense academy as well

reply

The love story as a whole is my one major problem with this movie, even more so than the miscasting of Keanu.

reply