MovieChat Forums > Whore (1991) Discussion > Someone punch me in the face...

Someone punch me in the face...


This is so comedically bad and painful to watch, especially when she licks her lips saying "head" like she's in 2nd grade.

http://www.livejournal.com/users/devilsmercy03

reply

I never saw the movie, but remember when it came out. I heard that it was a reply to "Pretty Woman" and supposed to show the reality of prostitution rather than the cinderella fairy tale plot of "Pretty Woman". I never saw it because Theresa Russell got the lead and she possibly might be the worst actress ever. She is horrible and after seeing a brilliant portrayal of a prostitute by Jane Fonda in "Klute", I thought it would just be a waste of time.

reply

to compare this "mockumentary" to "klute" is not only unfair, but not logical.
"klute" is stylistically different from this film. and jane fonda plays a 'call girl,' not a 'street walker.' the two films simply show different (fictionalized) realities.
and, you might not like theresa russell's acting, but you have to admit that she's in a pretty bad position trying to present a portrait of the character she's portraying.
i've also seen "pretty woman"...once. never had any desire to see a second time, because it's nonsensical, "cleaned up" (hollywoodish) fable of a prostitute, which is good, i guess, as far as it has anything to do with the tragedies that most of those women have to live. i, however, like russell's acting, and have seen "whore" 2 or 3 times over the years since it first came out. just so happens, though, that i'm also a big fan of ken russell...

gregory 032607

reply

Why, Kreth?

reply

I thought the film was quite good.

reply

Punch you in the face? Alright. Great, the movie made you feel icky and 'bad,' therefore it's 'bad.' Good for you. For all of us adults, along with 'Crimes of Passion,' a more brutally frank portrayal of prostitution. Whether one likes that or not is unimportant. Gotta agree with thegurujames, a very good film. FYI: Theresa Russell is considered an internationally acclaimed actress. She is not related to Ken Russell, incidentally. The film has all the basics of what it is to be a prostitute, and it ain't pretty or glamorous. Hollywood tends to have a desperate need to portray prostitution in a manner that has little-or-no basis in reality, partly because many professionals and producers in the industry frequent them. Ahem.

reply

[deleted]

I gotta agree: Whore is tongue-in-cheek, but it really does deal with some very genuine realities of prostitution. That's what makes it important. Actually, I think a new print of it--widescreen and uncut--wouldn't look all that dated. Some of the haircuts would date it, but otherwise it's done in a pretty generalized cinematic reality. Yes, it has many funny moments, but it struck me as fairly serious, just very stylized. Definitely a guilty pleasure, no doubt. Pimps are like the pimp-character--and worse, much worse. Most of them should be shot on-sight, but the cops and the government (municipal, state, federal) like the way things are. Also, rich women like punishing poor women just as their mates, but for reasons of infidelity. Our prostitution laws are inhuman.

reply

I think "breaking down the third wall" is always a giant mistake in a drama, and the fact that the main character talked to the camera ruined this film for me.

reply

See, some of us like it. To each their own. It's all artifice anyway.

reply

[deleted]

To you...

reply

[deleted]

From what I recall I didn't care for this movie much, I thought it was horrible.
Some of that had to do with the depressing, downbeat, diingy, distressing nature of what the film was trying to depict.

reply

Dude, she's not playing a great actress, she's playing a down-on-her-luck streetwalker who gets tricks by trying to convince them in ten seconds through their car windows. Subtle understatement isn't really the strategy to go with there.

reply

Theresa Russell is hot!!

reply

I for one found her phenomenal in this film (and man, can she ever jet!) Perhaps the naysayers only went into it seeking something more lascivious than what it was?

"POWER TO THE PEOPLE WHO PUNISH BAD CINEMA!!!"

reply

[deleted]

It would have been a totally different film had Holly Hunter done it.When Ms Hunter backed out the first time I suggested Holly Hunter. Ken had no idea who she was but I got him Texas Cheerleader Mom and went for her. Then Theresa came bach asking for half a million. That was 1/3 of the total budget. A huge he waste of money IMO.

reply

“Down-on-her-luck streetwalker” is a redundancy. This movie was great. They did their homework, e.g., customers are called “tricks” and not “Johns” (only people who are not in The Life—“squares”—call them Johns). The best part for me, though, was the theater marquis advertising the film, Lair of the White Worm, directed by Ken Russell, who also directed Whore! White Worm is 1 of my favorite films. I quite enjoyed this one, as well. They showed that pimps have Zero redeeming qualities. Not for nothing, the scene in the upscale French restaurant, where her pimp berated her for her ignorance but in fact paraded his own stupidity (MUCH worse than ignorance) was simultaneously droll and almost heartbreaking, and THAT is hard to do. My heart went out to her, and I wanted to shit down his throat.

reply

I agree with the OP. This movie was ATROCIOUS.

Made my eyes bleed.


-----------------------
When we're thinking about our own brain, would that be a mental paradox??

reply

I thought it was pretty good.

reply