weblock wearers
why did they still have the locks around their necks when they already deactivated the devices before they reached the money hidden place?
sharewhy did they still have the locks around their necks when they already deactivated the devices before they reached the money hidden place?
shareIn case they were intercepted afterwards, then no one would separate them so they could try and get away again?
It's not nihilism if there's a question mark at the end.
There really was no point. They stayed on for sake of the storyline on how it ended. Just bad writing.
p.s. its Wedlock, not Weblock.
I <3 Emily Blunt
They stayed on for sake of the storyline on how it ended.Thought the same thing. It perhaps could be argued that it was a precautionary pretence measure, in case they were intercepted again, which they were. But IRL, you'd have to think it was the last accessory they'd want to keep wearing.🐭 share