MovieChat Forums > Terminator 2: Judgment Day (1991) Discussion > Ridiculous that John Connor is supposed ...

Ridiculous that John Connor is supposed to be 10 here


He acted and looked nothing like a ten year old

reply

Yeah, it was a misstep.
But I can see how it happened. When Furlong was cast, he really did look a lot younger. Puberty hit really hard during filming. You can really see "young" John in the scene where he's helping Arnie fix the car. Those were some of the first scenes shot and he legit looks like he could be 10.
On top of that, the math in the story wouldn't work as well. It wouldn't be 1991 in the movie, it would be more like 1995. If they aged up John's character even more, it would be 1997.... right before the supposed war would happen, which I think would feel "too late" for the story they're trying to tell

reply

If you stream the movie you can freeze it when the T-1000, now a faux cop, scans for John Connor's location. It gives the kid's age (10), where he lives, and the various misdeeds he has done.

reply

Yes, I know.
What about it?

Nobody is saying he's not 10. The main argument is that he doesn't look or act 10.

reply

Been a long time since I saw the movie, but I don't think they reference how much time had passed between events or what year it is.

reply

It's easy to figure out.

The first movie takes place in May of 1984. John is conceived, so his Bday is early 1985.
This movie specifically states he is 10 years old.
So its 1995 for sure.

reply

OK. Like I said, haven't watched in at least 20 years.

reply