Only a 5.5?
I'll preface the subject title by saying I rate movies based on genre and if they did what they were created to do effectively. I gave this movie an 8. Why? Because I've seen it a ton of times and it's the kind of movie you can put on in the background when you're doing something else, and look up once in a while at nice boobs, cool fight scenes, and a few good one liners - oh, and one of the greatest main bad guy death scenes ever!
Being said, most people that watch Showdown are probably action fans. If you like "The Notebook" or "Titanic" this sort of movie probably isn't your usual cup of tea (although it could be). Showdown is at least better than 70% of the action movies out there. No, it's not on the level of Die Hard, but how many movies in the genre are?
Just curious on why it gets a 5.5? Do people come on here and say, "Gee, it's not as good as The Godfather or Shawshank Redemption or Die Hard or Aliens, so I'll give it a 5 or a 3 or a 1?"
I enjoyed this movie more than many big-budget action films - when I was a kid, and now. Anyway, just food for thought. It has a bunch of flaws and silliness, and is somewhat dated, but it's a good ride. I guess my point is to discuss how we rate movies. What is the baseline criteria when rating something like Showdown in Little Tokyo?