I can't tell the difference. They are even listed as having the same ISBN-10 number. But there must be some difference, because they are on two seperate Amazon pages, one is listed as "Bargain Price" and the other isn't, and they have different prices.
Does anyone here know what the difference (if any) is between these two editions?
Courage, men! We've not sunk before, and we'll not sink now!
The dimensions and shipping weight are different, but otherwise they look the same. Oddly enough, though, the larger one weighs less than the smaller one. They are probably both the same.
The bargain priced one includes the following...
"This is a bargain book and quantities are limited. Bargain books are new but could include a small mark from the publisher and an Amazon.com price sticker identifying them as such"
I'd say THAT is the difference. One is new, the other slightly worn.
- - - - - - - Whose idea was it for the word "Lisp" to have an "S" in it?
I'm not convinced that there is a larger one. The stats could be wrong. Why would the larger one weigh less than the smaller one when both are hardbacks?? The bargain version sounds like it has shelf wear or something, as well as stickers on it.
- - - - - - - Whose idea was it for the word "Lisp" to have an "S" in it?
There is also an edition from the 80's that is the first five chapters, and very nice bio on Dave Stevens with pictures of Dave with a Gee Bee, and his model for Peevey. I have it in my collection. The cover art is nice as well. http://www.amazon.com/The-Rocketeer-Action-Chapters-Graphic/dp/0913035 068
I've got that one. I've got the new Hardback from IDW as well that collects the entire Dave Stevens set, the one the OP is asking about. I have the Dark Horse trade paperback of Cliff's New York Adventure as well that collects all three parts and is a companion piece to the one you just linked.
- - - - - - - Whose idea was it for the word "Lisp" to have an "S" in it?
I still need to buy the Cliff's New York Adventure trade paperback. It's a little expensive right now on Amazon. I've been hoping to find it at my local used book shop. Nothing yet :(
Right now, I'm more interested in getting the hardcover book with the complete collection, but that one looks pretty nice as well. I might get it eventually. Thanks for the recommendation.
Courage, men! We've not sunk before, and we'll not sink now!
The older trade paperbacks are larger size than the IDW hardback, just to let you know. Of course, I believe if you get your hands on that box set complete collection from IDW, that is a larger size as well.
- - - - - - - Whose idea was it for the word "Lisp" to have an "S" in it?
The bargain priced would be what is known as a "remaindered edition." These are usually excess stock that are sold off at deep discount and are often sold via discount bookshops and in bargain sections in major book chains. It is common practice to mark these editions with a black line across the bottom edge, so they can be identified in case of returns. Some copies may have slight damage or wear from sitting in bookstores or warehouses. The listing copy is standard verbage used by bookstores to describe condition for potential book collectors. Not all copies may bee damaged, some might be in pristeen condition, but will still probably have a remainder mark on the bottom edge.
As for the collection itself, it reprints the original Rocketeer stories, which were printed in Paicfic Comics Starslayer and Pacific Presents comics, the Eclipse Comics Rocketeer Special and reprinted as the Rocketeer Graphic Novel (published by Eclipse) as well as Cliff's New York Adventure, published by Comico and completed at Dark Horse, then collected by Dark Horse. It also includes non-story Rocketeer images from pin-ups and other art. It does not include the Harlan Ellison introduction from the Eclipse graphic novel collection.
"Fortunately, Ah keep mah feathers numbered for just such an emergency!"
Thank you for the information. Since the "Bargain Price" edition is ironically more expensive on Amazon, I will avoid it.
It also includes non-story Rocketeer images from pin-ups and other art. It does not include the Harlan Ellison introduction from the Eclipse graphic novel collection.
Is the Harlan Ellison introduction very interesting?
Also, one thing that is often mentioned in descriptions for the hardcover collection is that the comics are recolored by Laura Martin, who Dave Stevens apparently wanted to do such a recoloring. Is the recoloring job an improvement, or does it make no significant difference in the visual quality of the artwork?
Courage, men! We've not sunk before, and we'll not sink now!
reply share
Personally, I'd never have noticed the recoloring had they not made it a point to advertise it. They did a good job and it looks like the original release, though I am left wondering why it was needed. Of course, I am no expert in the field so my opinion doesn't count for much regarding the recoloring.
- - - - - - - Whose idea was it for the word "Lisp" to have an "S" in it?
The original coloring was done in the then-standard four-color process, where you create a color guide for the printer, with percentage mixtures of the 4 color elements. Modern coloration is done on computer, which allows for a wider variety of tones, and eliminates the need for things like zip-atone- and benday dots, which were used to add texture. I suspect the old color guides were probably faded, too, which is not uncommon. Digital coloring lets the art pop out more.
In regards to the Ellison introduction, it is quite entertaining, as most of Ellison's writing is. It gives you a feel for Stevens' love of the period and a quick bio sketch of Bettie Page. Ellison wrote a great intro for this and one of Neil Gaiman's Sandman volumes. Both made better reading than much of what you find in the publishing world. Harlan's a fan, too.
"Fortunately, Ah keep mah feathers numbered for just such an emergency!"
Since I created this thread, I've become much more informed about the printing history of the Rocketeer. The Rocketeer comics have been recolored multiple times, and each coloring looks different from the others.
Here's a page from one of the original Rocketeer comic books:
The new "Complete Collection" (2009) is very nice, but I really love the 1985 collection. I only have the first book in that series (the first five "action" chapters). There was a second called Cliff's New York Adventures (the second half of the series) but I haven't found a good price on that (plus that story is in the "Complete Collection").
The 1985"action chapters" one has a great background article on Dave Stevens and his love of the era (great pictures too). I'd also recommend Dave Stevens autobiography (Brush With Passion). He talks a lot about the making of the film.
I'd also recommend Dave Stevens autobiography (Brush With Passion). He talks a lot about the making of the film.
That book is absolutely essential for anyone who's interested in art, comics, The Rocketeer, or Dave Stevens in general. It's sadly out-of-print, and not all that easy to find, but so ... sooo worth it.
----- Well don't come crying to me when you all get killed! reply share
Thanks for the links that show the difference. I will be honest in saying that the 1985 one looks best. It's more colorful and, for lack of a better way to describe it, less polished looking than the newest coloration. I wonder if there isn't such a thing as getting too perfect with this stuff, which might be what makes me like the latest iteration less. I'd compare it to high definition photography and/or televisions...there is a point where it gets too perfect and just starts looking fake. Maybe not a perfect comparison, but hopefully you can understand what I mean. It doesn't need to be absolutely perfect. It lost it's bold colors in the new version (as if looking at it through a slightly blue filter), though it may be more realistic looking in tones. This is comic book art, not photography, so it doesn't need to look too uber-realistic.
- - - - - - - Whose idea was it for the word "Lisp" to have an "S" in it?
I understand what you mean. However, the 2009 coloring has grown on me. For me, it's hard to choose between the 1985 and 2009 versions - they each have their own strengths. The 1985 version is a bit more saturated and much more "comic-booky", and the 2009 version is more atmospheric and cinematic. I think that the 2009 version suffers a bit in comparison if you look at it side by side with the 1985 version, but if you look at it by itself, it holds up very well on its own merits (in my opinion, anyhow).
By the way, here are two very interesting articles about Laura Martin's 2009 recoloring. They contain a lot of information about why the recoloring was done, and why Martin chose the particular style she did. The second in particular (written by Martin herself) is very in-depth.
The original coloring for "The Rocketeer: Cliff's New York Adventure" is a bit different, in that the coloring in the paperback compilation looks pretty much identical to the coloring from the three original comic books it was compiled from. Here are some comparisons between the coloring used in the original comics and the 1997 paperback, and that used in the 2009 version. Interestingly, the 2009 version actually looks more colorful in some places.
Today, I got "The Rocketeer: All 5 Action Chapters" in the mail. It turns out that the photo comparison I posted isn't quite accurate. Whoever scanned the "All 5 Action Chapters" edition for those photos did a bad job, or used a bad scanner. It turns out that the coloring in the actual book looks very close to the 2009 Laura Martin version - to the point that I now fully understand what you meant when, at first, you said "I'd never have noticed the recoloring had they not made it a point to advertise it." The difference between it and the new Laura Martin coloring is not nearly as drastic as the photo comparison I posted would imply.
Courage, men! We've not sunk before, and we'll not sink now!