I agree with the OP. This one felt like a remake of the first film, complete with dashing but devious rival love-interest/villain, and the climax, set at a reception regarding environmentally-clean energy wasn't as spectacular or exciting as the baseball-set ending in the first film or the Academy Awards ceremony spoof of the third.
The jokes were all great and as funny as ever, and Richard Griffith was a particular high-point in the dual roles of 'Dr. Meinheimer' and best of all, 'Earl Hacker' (whose gleeful odiousness makes me think the late Griffith might have made a great choice to play the 'Penguin' in a Batman movie), but the scenario didn't feel as fresh and memorable as the first and third film, which shook up the formula a little by featuring a non-smoothie lead villain.
reply
share