MovieChat Forums > Boyz n the Hood (1991) Discussion > Wouldn't Trey be tried as an accomplice ...

Wouldn't Trey be tried as an accomplice for being in the car?


Probably someone saw him in the car with the others on the way to kill Ricky's killers; even Furious couldn't reliably say Trey didn't take part in it since he ran off in defiance of his wishes.

reply

It's all about the prosecution and who is will to testify. Jason could have turned his son in, if he felt so morally bankrupt if he did not. But that is not the way the world works. A likely event is that the assailants would have gotten away, as testified in the movie. Doughboy searching the television stations for word of his brother's death. No mention, I recall, of the drive by assassination. Likely, the none of the gang members would have testified against each other.

reply

Yes.

All it takes is being in the car with the wrong person. That's why you have to think twice about who you associate with.

reply

That is why at the end of the movie Doughboy says to Tre that him getting out of the car was the right thing to do.

reply

If the gangsters testified that he got out of the car he would get off.

reply

In this setting, the film supposes that the LA County legal system wouldn't value the life of a "young black thug" enough to spend any resources on finding the killer of Ferris and his friends...it's more of the "they'll all kill eachother eventually, why waste the tax money??"

reply