Why did the he give Rhonda pants?
She was hot and lost her pants. Why would you be like "here have pants, I don't want you walking around in panties"
shareShe was hot and lost her pants. Why would you be like "here have pants, I don't want you walking around in panties"
shareMy thoughts exactly. She should have remained without her pants until the end of the movie. Because, with thighs like hers, who needed pants? At least Leprechaun 4 showed Jessica Collins get her pants taken off and no other pair to put on. I wish more films nowadays showed the hot lady having to lose her pants and not have on for the rest of the movie!
XTRO Theme: http://youtu.be/pcEeakcNB0k
LMAO.... this is a hilarious topic, I wish Scarlett Johansen would have lost her pants in Avengers, and her top.....
shareYeah, I was like why did you give her jeans!!?
"Whoo-ah"
If he had not given her the pants she might have seen his giant worm. That's a tremor that we weren't ready for!
shareBrilliant!
www.youtube.com/watch?v=P8DPdVpDbSg Teaser Trailer
Because he's a gentleman and not a perv. Apparently you're unfamiliar with this.
shareThis thread gave me a hearty laugh. Thank you everyone.
"Dreams die hard and you hold them in your hands long after they've turned to dust."
Hell yeah π
.... I was rooting for the graboids to eat that jerk who gave her pants ππ
But then there would be a thread asking why was she running around rest of the movie with just her panties on!!! Surely there were some pants (or shorts!!) in the town's only general store where they were holed up..
-----
wat are you lookin' at...π¬
To me, a pretty female seismologist in panties is definitely a 9.5 on my scale.
share