I had almost the same question as the OP. But my question is: why did they let Andy off the hook for the murders they thought he did?
I assumed that they blamed Andy for the murders, yet inexplicably also decided that it's fine that he murdered all those people.
As far as I can tell, there is nothing in the film to suggest that they didn't blame Andy for the murders - except the ludicrous implausibility of letting Andy off the hook as mentioned in the previous sentence.
But if they were blaming "someone else," then that would be equally ludicrous, because Andy was the only one present at the scene when his mother's friend was murdered.
So either way, blaming Andy, or not blaming Andy, that's lazy writing that makes no sense.
The film needed to explain this.
reply
share