MovieChat Forums > Seinfeld (1989) Discussion > I know I'm in the minority here...

I know I'm in the minority here...



but I never found this show to be the least bit funny. To me it was just about four whiny, narcissistic, annoying, self centered people in NYC, and I couldn't care less about them. I would watch it and wonder "When does the funny part start?"

Meh.


😎

reply

I didn't like George Costa.

reply


I assume you mean George Costanza, aka Jason Alexander.



😎

reply

Yes. Thank you.

reply


You're welcome.



😎

reply

Sitcoms age poorly and "Seinfeld" is no exception. In its day, when it reflected the zeitgeist, "Seinfeld" was indeed amusing. Nowadays, with humor a different animal than "Seinfeld"'s,, this once beloved TV staple is more grating than genuinely funny -- especially with that god-awful laughter punctuating each joke, however stale the joke may be.

reply


I didn't even find it funny in its day, but that's why they make chocolate and vanilla. And I agree on the god-awful laughter. I always find laugh tracks annoying. Of course for all I know maybe they filmed it "in front of
a live studio audience." Regardless, it's still irritating.



😎

reply

Though no amount of annoying laughter can ruin my appreciation for something like "Monty Python" -- those guys, when they're in their zone, are still hilarious (and boy do they make Seinfeld and his gang look like rank amateurs).

reply


Amen! They are the best!



😎

reply

A bit off-topic ... I said this on the "Game of Thrones" board and I'll say it here too: they need to end "Game of Thrones" the way they did "Monty Python and the Holy Grail." No other ending, frankly, will do.

reply


Nothing wrong with going off topic. I've never watched GOT, but that sounds like an excellent idea for the ending. Of course any MP ending is a good one.



😎

reply

"That's an offensive weapon, that is." *Grabs shield*

reply


"She turned me into a newt! I got better."



😎

reply

"Anyone got anything they'd rather be doing than marching HUP and down the square?"

reply


Did you just switch to "The Music Man" Ang? (One of my all time favs, btw)



😎

reply

"Monty Python and the Meaning of Life" actually.

"Now, how would you like it served? All .. uh .. mixed up together in a bucket?"
"Yeah ... WITH THE EGGS ON TOP!"

reply

MOUNTIES CHOIR

He's a lumberback and he's OK
He sleeps all night and works all day.

PALIN

I cut down trees, I skip and jump
I like to press wild flowers
I put on women's clothing
And hang around in bars.

reply


"I'm afraid I have no choice but to sell you all for scientific experiments."



😎

reply

Shit post. 2/10 gj

reply


???



:-)

reply

Although I became a fan later, I had the same initial reaction the first several times I tried to watch the show. At some point, something Kramer did broke my resistance, and then, over time, I came to appreciate each of the characters. Where I lived at the time aired Seinfeld reruns after Friends, so I would catch the end of Friends while waiting for Seinfeld. I never found Friends funny though. I noticed you mentioned South Park as funny. I've never been able to finish an episode of South Park, though I've tried more than a few times. I've heard lots of people say they enjoy it, but to me it just sounds like whining. I initially felt that way about both the Simpsons and Family Guy, but later grew to enjoy those shows to varying degrees, and then later grew out of them as well. All of this is just to say humor is a moving target.

reply


An interesting response, thanks. Never did get into Seinfeld, but I like Family Guy and American Dad. I used to like South Park, but it got too gross, so I gave it up. I also used to like the Simpsons, but got bored with it, and gave that up too.
Humor, as you say, is a moving target.

My favorite comedies now are The Goldbergs, Speechless, TBBT (although it's getting a bit long in the tooth), Young Sheldon, Mom, and The Mick.

I used to like The Last Man on Earth, but it has become a train wreck. I still watch just to see how far over the shark they can jump.



😎

reply


PS Love your name, one of the greatest comedies of all time.




😎

reply

Well, if you're looking for why other people love the show, here's my reason: I don't consider this a sitcom; to me, it's a satire. Seinfeld is very, very, very insightful into human foibles and social quirks. The idiosyncrasies, annoying habits, odd social customs, and general weirdness of people is skewered beautifully by the show.

When you see four whiny, narcissistic, annoying, self-centred people in NYC, I see cultural criticism in the highest order.

There are a tonne of other reasons: the one-liners are sharp, there's a poetry to the language that is very appealing, and the general sensibility of the show, etc., etc., but at its core, Seinfeld is a show which lampoons the human race, and I find that appealing comedically and intellectually.

I know it's not for everybody, but that's why I like it. It manages to be insightful and it gives me a laugh at the missteps of humankind when normally those follies just elicit depressed cynicism.

reply


You make some excellent points Ace, but I still don't like it.



😎

reply

[deleted]


Pop, you're over here now? Welcome aboard. And no, it's an old post which got resurrected.


😎

reply

well rebury it,
no need to have it cluttering the trending area

reply


Hey dude, I didn't bring it back up.



😎

reply

i was not accusing you,
i was only demanding you to rebury this thread immediately

reply


Demanding?? I will assume that you jest. And besides, how the hell am I supposed to do that?



😎

reply

I used to think it was the best sitcom ever. Maybe it is, but I made the mistake of watching reruns over and over for years. I memorized every situation and every line. I burned myself out, and now I can't watch it. I don't know if I ever will be able to again.

reply

I read that in Jerry's voice.
I'm also watching reruns nowadayas

reply


I think the majority agrees with your first thought.



😎

reply

Sorry I’m late to the party, but I’ve only just binge watched it for the first time recently.

It takes time to get going (season 1 and 2 just aren’t funny), although it picks up steam in season 3 and 4 (for me) it doesn’t hit its stride until season 5. It then just gets funnier until season 9 when it tails off.

It’s not the greatest comedy of all time, but it’s not bad; overall 7.5/10.

reply


Late to the party!? You have a talent for understatement.

BTW, I just returned from Spain, Portugal and Morocco. I believe you said that you had been to those countries.

😎

reply

Hope you had a nice time. I like Spain, but I love Portugal; Morocco is interesting.

reply


I had a great time, thanks. I agree about Spain and Portugal, especially Sintra and Mias. Morocco was a challenge.
I was very careful, but still go "Mohammad's Revenge".

😎

reply

"To me it was just about four whiny, narcissistic, annoying, self centered people in NYC"

Jerry and Elaine could be considered narcissistic and self-centered; George was self-centered but not narcissistic (he was the opposite, i.e., he had low self-esteem), and Kramer was neither narcissistic nor self-centered. He was friends with Newman of all people, and a dwarf, and called Jerry's parents once a week to make up for Jerry not calling them enough.

You said in another post that you liked Cheers. You don't think Sam, Diane, and Rebecca were whiny, narcissistic, and self-centered? You also said you liked Frasier. Frasier Crane was whiny, narcissistic, and self-centered on both Cheers and Frasier, and on Frasier, his brother Niles was even worse in those respects.

Sitcoms need oddball characters (and whiny, narcissistic, and self-centered characters are one of many flavors of oddball characters), because it's hard to create comedic situations with average Joe characters that never rock the social norms boat. Characters like that are only useful in comedies as a "straight man" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straight_man) to an oddball character, like Andy Taylor paired with Barney Fife on the Andy Griffith show.

reply