In a 1998 issue (#77) of a French magazine called Impact, Shane Black verified it: "The first film ended with a relatively closed end. I tried to write the second by making it constitute a logical continuation as if, in retrospect, the first one was not finished. Basically, Riggs' story is that of a misfit, someone who is morally dead and about to die physically. He is like Frankenstein. When this creature is taken in by a suburban family, he learns to live again. In this second part, an event kept his old demons alive and pushed him to make a sacrifice for this family that had almost saved him. Logically, he was therefore condemned to die. He was only living on borrowed time. And the fact that he had, for a tiny part of his existence, rediscovered life, prepared him to die in peace. I loved the scene of his death, it was brought about in a very particular, very intense way, and I am convinced that it had the potential to make an audience cry, who had originally come to see an action film."
The result: "When they read it, the people at the studio simply replied to me "But if you do that, we will never have a number 3." I told them that there could not be one. It was the most they could get out of this story, at least with me. In addition, Richard Donner liked the script but he wanted to make a comedy. He thought it was too dark, too depressing. He wanted the Three Stooges. I couldn't do a complete change of the ending and a comedy. So I left the project. They ended up using less than half of what I had written. They added this thief, played by Joe Pesci, to get their Three Stooges. The character of Leo Getz was already in my script... but only for one scene! It was a painful experience. I was terrified of my inability to satisfy the studio, of not being able to do what they asked me to do. To meet their expectations, I saw myself having to become a whore, who pockets the money and immediately goes behind the typewriter."
reply
share