MovieChat Forums > Batman (1989) Discussion > Learn nolan this is how you make a batma...

Learn nolan this is how you make a batman film

posted 5 years ago by SnyderLeagueArmy (46)
12 replies | jump to latest

But Nolan shitted batman films with a aids voice bane and a cancerous voice Batman

[–] MovieChatUser497 (18943) 5 years ago

Not at all, the Nolan films were vastly superior to the Burton films, although the Burton films are still entertaining enough, they are at least better than what Schumacher did.

[–] SnyderLeagueArmy (46) 5 years ago

Superior tell me another joke

[–] MovieChatUser497 (18943) 5 years ago

It's not a joke, not at all. The only film Burton ever made that was up to the level of Nolan was Edward Scissorhands.

[–] SnyderLeagueArmy (46) 5 years ago

Nolan is not a good filmmaker he is overrated thanks to the non English peoples who started their Hollywood film journey by his film true Hollywood fans knows he sucks and an overrated piece

[–] MovieChatUser497 (18943) 5 years ago

Nolan is my all time favorite filmmaker and he has only made one film that I didn't think was a masterpiece (Dunkirk). He's not overrated, in fact he's underrated if anything.

[–] SnyderLeagueArmy (46) 5 years ago

Dunkrik was a boring shit film how people's love it oh I forgot they love boring crap and this is the reason why sucker punch was not received well because people hate colorful inspiring film

[–] MovieChatUser497 (18943) 5 years ago

Dunkirk was kind of boring I agree, technically and visually it was very good but there was nothing under the surface, definitely not up to par with his other films. Hopefully tenet is better

[–] LiquidOcelot (2452) 5 years ago

This guy is a troll, ignore him.

[–] SnyderLeagueArmy (46) 5 years ago

I'm a true dc fan unlike those fake ass DC fans who are just fans of marvel and hack Nolan in reality

[–] [email protected] (383) 5 years ago

I liked the Nolan films as well

[–] SnyderLeagueArmy (46) 5 years ago

Read a comic book about Batman

[–] MovieChatUser497 (18943) 5 years ago

Films can differ from the source material and still be great, the director can put his own interpretation on it and still make a great film that stands on its own.

By your logic Lord Of The Rings is a bad movie because it differed so much from the novel.

One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest differed from the novel and it is one of the greatest films ever made.

The Count Of Monte Cristo (2002) was VERY different from the novel and audiences and critics seem to have liked it and I found it entertaining for what it was and I've accepted that a truly faithful adaptation is not really possible unless it's a mini-series considering how LONG the novel is (1250 freaking pages)

Overall, I couldn't care less if The Dark Knight Trilogy did meet your vision of what it should have been or if it was 100% faithful to the comics, it was a great franchise and one of the most beloved trilogies of all time.