MovieChat Forums > Mississippi Burning (1989) Discussion > Why was(or is ) the south so far behind?

Why was(or is ) the south so far behind?


Why was the south so far behind in terms of progress socially?

reply

Religion

reply

[deleted]

Not religion. Ignorance and fear of the unknown.

Also... I can kill you with my brain

reply

[deleted]

IMHO the biggest variable would probably the Reconstruction period. The North sent politicians down to dominate over the South after the Civil War and this caused a lot of resentment for the South toward the North and African Americans by proxy.

_
Check out http://www.FreedomainRadio.com for the only credible modern philosophy show.

reply

[deleted]

Hah, Brilliant reply.

_______________________________
"Life is too important to be taken seriously" - Oscar Wilde

reply

That's a bigoted thing to say. You people know nothing about the South.

nullo facere opinari omnia in serium convertere. vitae ad eundem modum jocari

reply

Uh... believe me, the working-class second-generation immigrants in Detroit, Brookyln, the Bronx, South Boston, South Philly, Chicago, Pittsburgh, and Cleveland probably were just as, if not more racist than the Dixie boys portrayed in this movie... make no mistake.

reply

i agree with both deasy852003 and Letshugitout, ignorance and fear of the unknown was a major cause but!!!, the white protestant churches of the south kicked it up a notch. corrupt preachers used Christianity as a weapon of hate towards blacks.

DonMachiavelli is also right about the racism found in the industrial cities of the north that he mentions. those northern cities are where the Irish, German, Jewish and Italians have strong foundations. but they too were victims of discrimination by the white Anglo Americans. where i am living (Long Island, NY)the new victims of hate are the latino americans mainly from Central America and the aggressors are the descendents of the same immigrants who were hated upon by the Anglo American population. mainly the Italians who are the most outspoken racists out here, why? god only knows.

reply

Did "the working-class second-generation immigrants in Detroit, Brookyln, the Bronx, South Boston, South Philly, Chicago, Pittsburgh, and Cleveland" hold a lot of public offices back in the day? LIke sheriff, mayor and judge?

reply

"White trash" suffered from parasites they picked up from the soil by running barefoot. The blacks were immune, but the poor whites were not, so they became chronically tired. That is true by the way, not made up shyt.

I forget the name of the parasite involved, but it came from Africa.... with the slaves. Talk about rough justice.

reply

I also think the heat and humidity and generations of inbreeding messes your brain up as well

reply

It was badly isolated before the age of the Interstates. It was much poorer, with an agrarian basis of its economy. In an agrarian society, wealth and poverty usually relate closely to ownership of land -- and land ownership in the South was extremely unequal. People could travel for miles on bad roads and see much the same thing. Few Southerners knew much else -- unless they had served in the Armed Forces.

Agrarian elites dominated politics. They resisted any industry because it might compete with their plantations for workers. They underinvested in education for all people but their own families. As with agrarian elites of other countries they were reactionary in their politics.

What forced the South to change? Elderly Northerners started traveling to Florida for the winter, and whether they came from Chicago or New York they had to travel through the segregated, backward South. They got to see the signs of segregation and got to hear a certain ugly word that begins with the letter N tossed around more frequently than a word like "food" or "money". Maybe elderly people were in no mood to protest, but they told their children and grandchildren the disgusting tales of segregation. Those children and grandchildren were often similarly disgusted. Some went to the South, especially (as relevant to this movie, to Mississippi).

Add to that -- television. The TV networks had no qualms about showing successful black people. If Southerners disliked that -- tough luck! Eventually the protests in the South against segregation and disenfranchisement drew TV cameras. ABC, CBS, and NBC could show some oily Southern pol saying that nothing is wrong and then make a cut to malnourished children. TV, unlike radio, is far more explicit in showing any violence -- and the segregationists used violence as means of repression.

Violence discredited the segregationists as nothing else could.

reply

You can thank John Wilkes Booth.

watch my movie-reviews
http://www.youtube.com/euromanmoviereport

reply

Actually plenty of white supremacists/racists exist in the North. In fact, ironically anywhere there are a lot of blacks, you will find haters of blacks. Therefore, the main center of people who hate racism would be places like New England with few blacks. However, that seems kind of a bad situation, as the anti-racism doesn't seem authentic.

Note, I'm not backing racism or saying it's good, only an observation.

reply

Note, also that the more educated whites in the north would be more likely to be kinder to blacks, than poor northerners in competition with blacks, and that may have been the case in the south also.

reply