Whatever the origin of Inferno and Hellseeker, the fact is that both movies were heavily lacking not just in Pinhead, but in practically the entire mythos of the Cenobites that the earlier segments of the series were based on. They were mostly psychological horror with elements taken from a lot of outside sources (Jacob's Ladder, detective noirs, even Groundhog Day) with the Cenobite stuff kept to a minimum, making it seem tacked on.
Furthermore, I think the series at this point strayed heavily from its original premise by presenting the Cenobite realm as a place where the dead were being punished for their sins. If you look at the original film (as well as the short story it was based on), the realm is never even referred to as "Hell," the inhabitants come there alive and mostly voluntarily (even if they don't realize what they're getting themselves into), and the Cenobites themselves are basically a kind of supernatural sadomasochistic cult from another dimension. And while the second film does start using the word "Hell" to describe the realm, it still remains pretty far from the traditional Western concept of Hell.
By Inferno and Hellseeker, the original concept had made way for simplistic religious fables about sinners reaping what they sowed in the afterlife. Whether these installments were actually conceived as Hellraiser stories from the start or not isn't the point. One way or another, they didn't have a whole lot of the original conception of the series in them, and you wouldn't have had to change a lot to turn them into something totally different.
reply
share