2 questions
1. She was 9 weeks old? Well on Lindy's website it shows her walking the baby and that baby looks more like 9 months old imo.
http://www.lindychamberlain.com/content/home
2. Did they ever recover the babies body?
1. She was 9 weeks old? Well on Lindy's website it shows her walking the baby and that baby looks more like 9 months old imo.
http://www.lindychamberlain.com/content/home
2. Did they ever recover the babies body?
[deleted]
You know, you're kind of right, the child did look a lot older than 9 weeks. Not sure what the deal is with that. And I was wondering the same thing about the body. No one ever says that for sure. I know there were coroners involved, but if they weren't examining a body, what were they examining? I know they recovered the little jumpsuit she wore, I guess they could divine something from that, but I'm not entirely sure.
shareAzaria was 9 weeks and 6 days old. Being supported in a non-weight bearing standing position by her mother for a quick photo does not instantly make the child age more than what she was - a BABY held by her mum. There was NEVER any truth to the ridiculous story told by Frank Cole - who was suffering the early stages of dementia - when he told the nations media his mates had shot a dingo carrying a baby - his story was swifty discredited - and then he went on to claim knowledge of a murder - so the police gave him a formal warning to stop trying to cash in on high profile cases... End of discussion on this. Azaria was taken by a dingo, the police, media and gossipers took it to the next horrible level, Lindy's innocence was proven and the final piece of this awful chapter in Australia's judicial history will be corrected in the 4th inquest later this year.
shareYou fancy yourself quite the expert it seems. Odd also that you would come to a public forum and say "end of discussion!" People can think and discuss what they like, including whether Lindy is innocent or not.
shareLOL actually darling the "experts" were the ones that stuffed this whole thing up. I'm simply a friend of someone who's own experiences and statements were never used in a completely horrible and nasty chapter of his family's life. In case you missed it, there was another child in that tent that night. Reagan!!! The dingo walked over his back to get to his little sister. To hear his perspective of everything from his point of view blew me away - theres so much more that WASNT ever made public, written about in the media or on this US made movie. To see, hear and know this for myself cements TRUTH forever. For those who still dont want to be educated 30 years on I feel nothing but pity. You keep watching movies BASED on real life events and gossiping about someone you dont know and judgements about her innocence or whatever. Your angle is based on what you could NEVER fully understand through the perspective of those who actually lived through it. They didnt ask for their whole lives to "talked about" like this. This is a message board on a page about a movie - not a court room - Lindy's innocence has already been proven so your point is irrelevant. I only hope someone's innocence is never in your hands through that REAL LIFE forum.
sharePeople can think and discuss what they like, including whether Lindy is innocent or not.How would you like people discussing how much of a slut susannah2000 might be, when you know yourself you're a fine upstanding virtuous woman? Just sayin'!
[deleted]
It would be stupid and pointless to discuss whether she is guilty since part of the clothing was found and it was ruled that a dingo did take the baby. Plus, people would be discussing what is not even true. You need to go back and read IMDb's Terms of Service and Community Guidelines because they rule out people discussing people thinking and discussing what they like. The discussions have to be done in an intelligent manner.
"Do All Things For God's Glory"-1 Corinthians 10:31
I try doing this with my posts
http://www.lindychamberlain.com/content/home
to make clickable
[url][/url ]
copy paste your link in between the 2 urls then remove the space between the letter l and the bracket ] on the far right
clickable link
http://www.lindychamberlain.com/content/home
It shows Mrs. Chamberlain posing the child on her feet. Did the picture move, that you saw the child walk?
Swing away, Merrill....Merrill, swing away...share
[deleted]