MovieChat Forums > Critters 2 (1988) Discussion > NOT THAT BAD!!!

NOT THAT BAD!!!

posted 19 years ago by smd132
13 replies | jump to latest

Ok, it sucks a little!
Ok, it sucks a wee bit more than a little!
But it is a good waste of your time!
Its crazy and funny and well worth at least a score of 5.
But 4.1: HARSH!

[–] bring_back_Pluto 19 years ago

I've seen (honestly) just about every film released since the 50s - plus all the classics ------ except for the most ultra-obscure films, I've seen them ALL!! (movies are my near-autistic obsession) ------ and I must say, CRITTERS 2 is ranked fairly high in my book --- I really really enjoy the Critters films - and number 2 is my favorite of the four............ it's great fun - and like you said, worthy of at least a "five"

[–] agtsmith-1 18 years ago

Yeah, it's like with the Alien movies. In part 2 there is more of everything: more critters, more action, more gore and more fun. As much as I love the first one, the second is just slightly better in my opinion. And it deserves definitely a rating above 5 or 6, not just 4.1.

[–] Incredible_Brightness 18 years ago

This was a fantastic sequel and it just proves that most of the people who have rated it are utter MORONS. I'd give it a 7 at least! It was a lot of fun, even more fun than the original.

"Carol, one word of advice: send Cindy to a special school"

[–] Doc110894 18 years ago

I haven't watched this movie all the way through in a long time. I need to watch it again. I liked it as a kid, but remember slightly prefering the original.

[–] Slainmonkey 16 years ago

Critter 2 was a damn fine sequel, it know that the Krites has used up pretty much all the surprises in the first so desided to just have fun with the idea. In that way Critters 2 was nearly as good as the first.

[–] nashknight-1 17 years ago

This is not a bad movie at all! A decent 6 was my grade

[–] RobBase086-1 17 years ago

This is not a bad movie at all to really watch! I enjoyed watching it especially when the Crates hunter turns into that Playboy Playmate! I loved that part and then when Charlie is trying to get the hunter to remain that Playboy Playmate and instead changes into that goofy looking guy.

I cannot think of the actors name but he has appeared in a lot of movies. I loved him in a lot of the cult classic films that he has done because he is funny as hell.

[–] 17 years ago

[deleted]

[–] RobBase086-1 16 years ago

You are totally correct on that answer and Eddie Deezen has been in lots of movies. He does a great job like you said playing the nerd!

Yes Critters 2 is a great movie to watch and it is fun too!

Yes that is a great self-promotional in joke when Lee sees the image of Freddy Krueger. (You are correct about New Line having produced both the "Elm Street films and "Critters" movies.) Yes but Charlie did shove that Playboy magazine which was great! I thought that actress was totally hot too! It is a shame that she passed away in a car accident.

Dedicated to USA UP ALL NIGHT and the fans of the show! www.deefilmroll.com/usa-uan/

[–] Dragoneyed363 16 years ago

I agree.

This at least deserves about a 5.2 or 1, and yes, it is a big difference from 4.3 because if a film has a 5 or over it is at least considered halfway decent and this should be.

Excellent sequel to the fantastic original...

Adam Lambert for AI 2009!

[–] Woodyanders 14 years ago

I agree. This was a good and enjoyable sequel to the excellent original.

1,000 mini-bios and I feel like I'm just getting started

[–] kandrakole 12 years ago

i'd say six or seven.

[–] MadDog-ThrashTillDeath 11 years ago

not that bad???? ... this is not bad at all!!! ... great sequel1!!!!! a 7 in my book!

- Thundering chords is what life's all about - Gerre