after being shot as many times as Sean Connery was? He must have been shot about 20 times! He not only lived several minutes but drug himself clear across his apartment. Is this medically possible?
No, but i think it was deliberate to show the consequences of Malone's amoral attitude towards violence. He delighted in putting the other man down and schooling Ness to "shoot first" no matter what, mocking the bad guy for bringing "a knife to a gun fight" etc. Perhaps i'm giving De Palma too much credit, but that's the feeling i had. Ness gets off too easily because he's the family man.
don't forget about the fact that they *had* to show Connery taking a drink of whiskey before being cut to ribbons - I know it's a stylistic "device" DePalma uses in the film (an obvious one at that), but it doesn't work the way the oranges did in The Godfather films.
Please nest your IMDB page, and respond to the correct person -
it has nothing to do with alcohol. People don't nest their pages on imdb - they respond to the last person as if it's the OP, because they don't know how to work the board correctly.
Please nest your IMDB page, and respond to the correct person -
I haven't seen Godfather in a while but what's ridiculous to me in that movie is how the Godfather played by Marlon Brando was able to survive getting shot several times with a machine gun! But I admit this scene in the Untouchables is also pretty unrealistic. I can't believe Sean Connery won an oscar for this movie.
"You know Parker, I don't think I've made you suffer enough." Green Goblin Spidey TAS
I would have to disagree with you guys. Unrealistic it may be, but given my love and attachment for Malone at that point, my suspension of disbelief was strong for me enough not to think of that detail and to just be upset about the scene and his agonizing death. I actually think it is one of the most powerful scene in the film, dramatically speaking, and it definitely fueled the rest of the film. It was the same thing for me in The Godfather, and for the record, Brando's character was not shot with a machine gun, but with several handguns (unlike Sonny, aka James Caan, who was just multiple times with multiple Tommy machine guns).
Bill Foster: I'm the bad guy?...How did that happen?
The answer to the original question is of course: it's most improbable. However, sometimes you'd be surprised. A reasonable use of a spare 90 minutes is: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0095366/
PS I'm not sure it was the best idea to script it for Malone to be holding a shotgun when he's shot. There's a pause of a couple of seconds between his seeing Nitti and Nitti shooting him. But it seems out of character for Malone to hesitate before letting Nitti have it. This awkardness could have been avoided by having him chase out the first hitman using something other than a range weapon, eg a meat cleaver, baseball bat, whatever.
"I beseech ye in the bowels of Christ, think that ye may be mistaken."
Malone was way to far away from Nitty for a shot gun to be effective - he would have been better off throwing a rock at him.
I think the idea of having Malone shot up so bad, and crawling so far, and the time passage was to show the will he had. The bookeeper was the only real hope they had in getting Capone, and Malone knew he was the only chance to pass that information on.
You just have to be resigned- You're crashing by design
Malone was way to far away from Nitty for a shot gun to be effective
With due respect, I have to disagree with you on that. It looked to me as if Nitti was about ten yards away, anyway less than fifteen. Malone's weapon was I believe a Winchester 97 12 gauge - I don't know what it was supposed to be loaded with, but with something like No 4 birdshot it would be pretty effective at twenty yards, maybe even thirty. The actual distance was about half that, and the inverse square law applies. With a reasonably good aim (which Malone could presumably manage) Nitti might not have been killed, but the threat he constituted would have been immediately and substantially reduced. I would not wish to be standing 10-15 yards in front of someone firing that weapon at me. (Also, being such an old weapon it doesn't have a trigger disconnector and so would lend itself to five or six shells being slamfired, ie very rapidly.)
Of course you're right about Malone's motivation.
Edit PS: Out of curiosity I've just checked what ammunition the US Army used with its Winchester 97s in WWI, when the idea was to kill men from the sort of range we're talking about, and it was 00 buckshot, so maybe that's what Malone would have been using around 1930. Here's a clip showing what it does at 25 yards - something like twice the distance of the film scene... inverse square law...etc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eFvIlgiZQ4
I beseech ye in the bowels of Christ, think that ye may be mistaken. reply share
Agreed. But, maybe my memory is poor. I took Niity to be much further away. It seemed he was behind where the knife guy was, and up on a fire escape or something.
You just have to be resigned- You're crashing by design