Larry should have sued his ex-wife!
Why didn't Larry sue his ex-wife for stealing his book and putting her name on it?
shareWhy didn't Larry sue his ex-wife for stealing his book and putting her name on it?
shareI've always wondered that myself. Is it possible he had no proof that she stole his story?
The Falcon flies
Well at the time writers tended to only have one copy of their script - you know since they were typing them. Since the main character seems to be kind of anal, he probably didn't show his work to anyone but his wife. That way no one could say "yes or no" to the fact that he wrote it and his wife could take all the credit she wanted and no one would be the wiser.
That isn't as easy to do now that people mainly write on computers. There is always an electronic signature of some kind, plus writers (at least *this* writer) tends to keep back ups of everything in case of computer failure.
Another thought that maybe she edited the book so much she really did think it was hers and not her husbands work...
"God is Dead" Nietzsche
"Nietzsche is dead" God
[deleted]
How about a third option? She stole the idea to write about their life, and wrote the book herself.
shareIf you believe what Owen's friend Larry says, Margaret is untalented and can't write.
It sounds like Larry had only one completed copy, and Margaret took it. In court, it would be his word against hers. Larry probably couldn't produce witnesses (e.g. friends, visitors, and his agent) who saw him writing a novel and actual completed chapters.
Larry could probably quite easily demonstrate intimate knowledge of enough details from the book to prove it was his work, in much the same way Margaret Keane proved she was the “Big Eyes” artist, and not her husband, Walter. Margaret wouldn’t have been able to fluidly and quickly respond to questions, nor could she have duplicated Larry’s style if asked to write a few paragraphs.
share