Am I the only one?


Who thinks that this movie is miles better than the original? There's just a lot more happening in this movie.

reply

[deleted]

"Better" than the original?
Not at all.

And so, God came forth and proclaimed widescreen is the best.
Sony 16:9

reply

The original was pretty crap, not scary, not funny, so why exist at all?

This is hilarious, pretty much the invention of slapstick horror.

reply

Because a lot of people do like it, you pompous ass. You think because you didn't like something it should cease to exist? Screw you!

reply

It is by far the best of the series and my favorite movie of all time.

reply

When I watched it in a first time, I thought that is funny and kinda strange movie. But anyway, I loved it! First is my favorite and then this film.

reply

The original was pretty terrible, the effects couldn't hold up the story.

The voices were pretty creepy though.

This movie though? Just floored me, so *beep* hilarious!!!!

reply

Probably not but it is unfair. Evil Dead was a super low budget production by a group of young filmmakers who just wanted to make a movie. What they managed to create is quite impressive. So many other low budget horrors from the era have disappeared from consciousness.


reply

No, you're obviously not the only one. The general consensus is, clearly, that Evil Dead II is the best one in the trilogy.

And I say this as someone who, personally, thinks that Army of Darkness is the best one.

http://twitter.com/solmaquina

reply

Ash isn't really Ash in the first film.

'Army of Darkness' is probably my favorite, followed by 'Evil Dead II'.

reply