MovieChat Forums > Broadcast News (1987) Discussion > Entirely too predictable..

Entirely too predictable..


I knew where this movie was going before the actors probably did when they first read the script. It was apparent that the awkward and warped relationship between Albert Brooks' character and the shiksa played by Holly Hunter was going to fuel this entire film. This whole thing was to celebrate their nerdy bond and their repertoire together. The unreality of it all when Holly Hunter's character had fallen in "love" with William Hurt's character, but kept taking breaks from it all to run back to Albert Brooks' character again, was absurb. Then again, that's what movies are. They're unreality. At least most of the good romantic ones do tend to mimic reality, which is something I can't say for this film. The news segments were pretty cool, but the underlying love story was total garbage.

reply

So it was absurd and didn't mimic reality, but it was also "entirely too predictable?" OK.

reply

If you haven't seen these kinds of relationships in real life you must not know a wide enough variety of people.

-----
New RBB: http://tinyurl.com/NewMcRBB
S1-4: School; S5-8: Shambles; S9: Superhero

reply

Disagree with OP. A predictable movie would have had Holly Hunter end up happily-ever-after with either Albert Brooks or William Hurt. Didn't happen. Her discovery of William Hurt's manipulation of the interview footage was not predictable. This movie is anything but predictable. Pretty bone-headed assertion by the OP.

reply

[deleted]