MovieChat Forums > The Belly of an Architect (1987) Discussion > Am I the only person in the world that t...

Am I the only person in the world that thinks this movie is spectacular?




Every person I have shown this film to has either felt nothingness that was turned into a dislike once I probed them for further opinions or have disliked the film from the beginning. I however think this film is one of Greenaway's best and even one of my favorite films overall. Just to further my point, when I came to see other people's opinions on the film, I find that there isn't even a single topic on the message board. Wow, so voice your thoughts please. I want to hear what others thought of this film.


reply

This is also my favorite Greenaway film. I find in it a more consistent narrative than he usually employs, and also the architectural scenery, with the ruins of the defunct empire , fits perfectly the decay of the protagonist's life, and also that of Enlightement's ideals.

reply

Yes, this is the most accessible of Greenaway's films, exceeded perhaps by "Cook, Thief". The rest of his films go completely over my head.

reply

I think it is; Maybe not his best film (behind The Cook, The Thief, His Wife & Her Lover (1989), The Draughtsman's Contract (1982) and perhaps A Zed and Two Noughts (1985) although it's a close finish) but it is excellent. Dennehy ('That Guy From Rambo') puts in a performance that's arguably greater than that of any other lead in a Greenaway film. The visuals are excellent as usual, provided you don't mind a bit of symmetry, of course. I liked the location, Rome seems like a natural place for a Greenaway film to be set given all the painterly shots he creates in his films. Combining the shots with the score (which is perfect) has a rather mesmerizing effect, too.

On the topic of whether it is accessible or mainstream, I think it is both of those things more than a film like Drowning by Numbers (1988) or a Zed and Two Noughts (1985), although it is still esoteric despite a relative lack of absurdity. Also, I think there's still much more of a distancing effect here than in The Cook... which as I recall had more close-up shots of the drama, inviting the audience to really feel something about the characters. Going against the 'mainstream' argument for that film though is some of the content (cannibalism, sex/nudity), though if you accept an England-Thatcher type interpretation of its plot it may not be so difficult to find meaning.

Is this your homework, Larry?

reply

Well I wouldn't call an average user rating of 7.0 "universal dislike"...



--
Grammar:
The difference between knowing your sh**
and knowing you're sh**.

reply

It's a shame more people haven't had a chance to see this truly unique film. Unless you can find this on DVD somewhere obscure, chances are you won't see it. Not the sort of thing that tends to pop up on HBO these days, even late at night.

Looking back, I think Dennehy was a very odd but insanely inspired casting choice. He inhabited the role and made it his. If the film had had better marketing at the time, there could have been an outside shot at an Oscar nomination for Dennehy. This was before the time of Miramax and the Indie publicity machine, I believe.


"You're telling me the future is video and NOT film?"

reply

I enjoyed it immensely

my rating 8/10

reply