MovieChat Forums > The Bold and the Beautiful (1987) Discussion > Why Shouldn't Steffy...

Why Shouldn't Steffy...

posted 8 years ago by cshep79406
10 replies | jump to latest

...sleep with Liam? After all, she walked out on her husband a full ten minutes ago.

[–] kalika204 8 years ago

 I know, right?
Ho-bag.

[–] officerhaughty 8 years ago

A ho is someone who has sex with someone whom he or she isn't in love with. Since Steffy is in love with Liam, by definition she isn't a ho.

[–] bratface23 8 years ago

A ho is someone who has sex with someone whom he or she isn't in love with

That is a huge generalization. Have you been in love with everybody you had sex with?

Maybe life is a dream and we wake up when we die?

[–] officerhaughty 8 years ago

"Ho" refers to promiscuity. A person who has a one night stand, friends with benefits, etc has demonstrated that he or she is obsessed with sex and does not care whom it's with, because if they did care, they wouldn't have done it outside the confines of monogamy.

[–] bratface23 8 years ago

Seriously? What century do you live in?

Maybe life is a dream and we wake up when we die?

[–] officerhaughty 8 years ago

I apologize for having morals 

And why aren't you criticizing the other posters for calling Steffy a "ho" for having sex not with some random dude but with her boyfriend?

[–] bratface23 8 years ago

My point is we have no right to judge people, but also who decides what is moral? You have the right to think what is or isn't moral for you but not the right to impose it on others. I wouldn't call anybody a 'ho', it's not my place.

The reason I commented is because it sounded like you were extending your opinion to 'real' people. If not I apologize.



Maybe life is a dream and we wake up when we die?

[–] officerhaughty 8 years ago

She and Wyatt are broken up (and have been for weeks, btw; not "ten minutes"). She's free to be with whom she wants to; as is he.

[–] cshep79406 8 years ago

No, she is not free. They are not divorced. And she moved back in with Wyatt a few days ago, only to leave before she had even finished unpacking because Wyatt wouldn't jump through her silly hoops.

[–] officerhaughty 8 years ago

No, she is not free.
Yes she is. She and Wyatt are no longer together. Likewise, if Wyatt wants to start dating some other woman, he is within his rights to do so.

They are not divorced.
That's only because the judge hasn't finalized it yet. It's merely a formality. Do you really expect them to get some judge's permission before they can date other people? Don't be silly. They are broken up; the breakup simply isn't recognized by the state yet.

And she moved back in with Wyatt a few days ago, only to leave before she had even finished unpacking because Wyatt wouldn't jump through her silly hoops.
Steffy made it clear that getting back together with Wyatt was conditional-it wasn't a done deal. That's precisely why they broke up again so quickly. The relationship was over for the past several weeks; she really just acted like she was going to move back in out of guilt.