MovieChat Forums > Something Wild (1986) Discussion > Why is this considered a comedy?--spoile...

Why is this considered a comedy?--spoiler


What, there's a couple funny moments in it? It doesn't even qualify as a dark comedy... all movies have some funny moments in them if they're worth a damn. Let's see, crazy chick kidnaps some guy, they're chased on a road trip by her psycho, and I mean no one does psycho like Liotta, husband, who repeatedly beats her, and her new boyfriend, and eventually winds up being gutted with a hunting knife in the brutal final scene?

If this is comdey, it's time to reclassify Taxi Driver, Pacific Heights and Kalifornia. Oh, and don't get me wrong, it's a great flick.

reply

I think it's a comedy because it's not belevable -wouldn't happen in real life Demme knew this & it is a great story & Liotta's 1st big movie.

reply

This movie is unique and amazing in that it is a comedy until Ray appears as Audrey and Charles are slow-dancing at Audrey's class reunion. Then it becomes a cold-blooded drama. I've never seen any other movie even attempt this. I guess the real trick would be to write a cold-blooded drama which turns into a comedy! That seems impossible to pull off.

The first time I saw this on video with two other people, we were definitely laughing all through the opening sequences where Lulu/Audrey "picks up" Charlie and takes him to the cheap motel then handcuffs him & bangs him, and through the scenes where Lulu/Audrey pulls off all her other mischief (robbing the cash register at the liquor store, not paying the bill at the restaurant).

reply

it's all marketing, man. of course it's not just a comedy... it's so much more than that. but it's much easier to advertise a picture by lumping it into a profitable genre. im sure if you ask Demme, he wouldnt call it merely a comedy either.

reply

Agreed, it was a really, really bad mixture of romantic comedy and a thriller and promoted as a light romantic comedy. No wonder the movie did so bad in the box office. The film was still entertaining, but the serious turn of events made for a very disturbing cinema viewing experience. Perhaps too many decisions makers had interfered with Jonathan Demme's vision?






If you love and support Michael Jackson 100%, copy & paste this into your signature. We love MJ!

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]