I always saw it as a girl and her gay best friend relationship. Then I listened to the director's commentary on the DVD and was shocked--SHOCKED--to hear the director describe their relationship as being one of unexpressed romantic love for one another. what What WHAT!? Is this guy blind, deaf and dumb? Is he not seeing the same movie clips as we, the viewer are seeing!? Is he on the spectrum and unable to read body language between two people? How can anyone watching this mistake Andie for being in love with Duckie or even for Duckie being in love with Andie?? And we're talking about the DIRECTOR--he's all up in there with the nuances of the characters all day, every day! I was just shocked at how detached the dude seemed from the very story and characters he was working intimately with literally every day. Was dude's gaydar jammed? Because Ducky queened it UP with those limp wrists of his, henny. And Andie was completely indifferent towards him whenever he'd flying into his theatrics.
Andie was 100% correct when she told the director "My character would never end up with Duckie." And she was 17-years-old! Having to tell a seasoned director this (and she was 100% correct). I believe in later years Molly Ringwald has stated that Duckie was gay but just didn't know it yet. NAILED IT. She clearly had her pulse on the situation even back then, unbeknownst to the director!
It still just shocks me at how all of these people could be working on the same exact movie but individually read the relationships before them so completely differently. That should've been a huge red flag for John Hughes to never work with this director ever again.
reply
share